BEREAN.AI ← Ask a Question

Balancing Analogy and Example in Understanding God's Nature

Understanding God's nature often involves the use of analogy and example, though these tools must be handled carefully due to the inherent difference between the Creator and creation [1, 3]. Analogies function by drawing comparisons between two different things, illustrating one subject by referring to another [2]. Examples, on the other hand, present a specific instance or model to be followed or understood [4, 5].

The Bible frequently employs analogies to describe God, recognizing that human language and understanding are limited when attempting to grasp the divine. For instance, God is called "Light," but early Christian thinkers like John Chrysostom cautioned against extending this analogy too far. While light illuminates and guides, natural light also "yields to darkness, and is circumscribed by space, and is moved by another power, and is overshadowed," none of which can be applied to the divine essence [11]. This highlights the need to discern which aspects of an analogy are applicable and which are not. The purpose of such analogies is to "reap some profit" from the comparison without attributing human limitations to God [11].

Similarly, God is described as a "Father" [13]. This analogy conveys concepts of care, authority, and origin, but it does not imply that God possesses human biological characteristics or limitations associated with earthly fatherhood. The use of such terms helps humans relate to and comprehend aspects of God's character, even while acknowledging His transcendence.

Examples, particularly the example of Christ, serve a distinct purpose in understanding God's nature and will for humanity. Jesus Christ is presented as the "perfect example" [5]. His life demonstrates holiness, righteousness, purity, love, humility, meekness, obedience, and self-denial [5]. He is the "image of God" [6, 9, 10], meaning He is the "exact likeness and perfect Representative" of God [9]. The apostle Paul describes Christ as "subsisting in the form of God," indicating His divine essence and self-manifesting characteristics [8]. Therefore, observing Christ's actions and character provides a concrete model for human behavior and offers insight into the divine will [5].

The concept of humanity being created "in the image of God" (Genesis 1:26-27) is another area where analogy and example intersect. John Calvin, in his Commentary on Genesis, acknowledged that there is "something in man which refers to the Father and the Son, and the Spirit" [7]. This "image" is not merely a physical resemblance but pertains to the spiritual and moral capacities of humanity, such as knowledge [10, 12]. The "new man" in Christ is "being renewed in knowledge after the image of him that created him" [10]. This renewal implies a progressive conformity to God's character, moving "unto perfect knowledge" [10]. The original creation in God's image provides an analogical link, while Christ's perfect embodiment of that image serves as the ultimate example for human restoration and growth [5, 10].

The distinction between analogy and example is crucial. An analogy helps to describe what God is like in certain respects, using familiar concepts to bridge the gap between human understanding and divine reality. An example, especially that of Christ, shows how God acts and what God desires for humanity, providing a pattern for life and faith [4, 5]. While analogies can be limited and require careful interpretation to avoid anthropomorphism, examples, particularly Christ's, offer a direct and perfect model [5, 11].

The Bible itself contains various forms of figurative language that function similarly to analogies, such as parables, similitudes, and metaphors [2]. These are not meant to be exhaustive definitions but rather illustrative comparisons that convey specific truths. For instance, the parables of Jesus are "illustrations of one subject by another" [2]. They use earthly stories to explain heavenly principles, requiring listeners to understand the intended point of comparison without literalizing every detail.

The use of analogy and example is particularly evident in discussions about God's attributes. When God is described as "just," it is an analogy to human justice, but with the understanding that divine justice is perfect and absolute, unlike flawed human justice [1, 3]. Similarly, God's love is analogous to human love, yet it is infinitely greater in scope, purity, and steadfastness. The example of Christ's sacrificial love (John 13:34) provides a concrete manifestation of divine love that humans are called to emulate [5].

The challenge lies in recognizing the limitations of analogy. As John Chrysostom noted, not all circumstances of a natural phenomenon can be applied to God [11]. The divine nature is unique and incomparable in its essence [1, 3]. Therefore, while analogies offer a pathway to understanding, they must always be held in tension with the doctrine of divine transcendence, which asserts God's absolute otherness and superiority to creation. The purpose is not to reduce God to human terms but to elevate human understanding towards divine truth.

Sources

  1. Job “Job 9:2 (Geneva1599) — I knowe verily that it is so: for howe should man compared vnto God, be iustified?”
  2. Smith's Bible Dictionary “Smith's Bible Dictionary: Parable — (The word parable is in Greek parable (parabole) which signifies placing beside or together, a comparison, a parable is therefore literally a placing beside, a comparison, a similitude, an illustration of one subject by another.--McClintock and Strong. As used in the New Testament it had a very wide application, being applied sometimes to the shortest proverbs, (1 Samuel 10:12; 24:13; 2 Chronicles 7:20) sometimes to dark prophetic utterances, (Numbers 23:7,18; 24:3; Ezekiel 20:49) sometimes to enigmatic maxims, (Psalms 78:2; Proverbs 1:6) or metaphors expand”
  3. Job “Job 22:2 (DRC) — Can man be compared with God, even though he were of perfect knowledge?”
  4. Torrey's Topical Textbook “Torrey's Topical Textbook: Diligence — Christ, an example -- Mr 1:35; Lu 2:49. Required by God in Seeking him. -- 1Ch 22:19; Heb 11:6. Obeying him. -- De 6:17; 11:13. Hearkening to him. -- Isa 55:2. Striving after perfection. -- Php 3:13,14. Cultivating Christian graces. -- 2Pe 1:5. Keeping the souls. -- De 4:9. Keeping the heart. -- Pr 4:23. Labours of love. -- Heb 6:10-12. Following every good work. -- 1Ti 5:10. Guarding against defilement. -- Heb 12:15. Seeking to be found spotless. -- 2Pe 3:14. Making our call, &c, sure. -- 2Pe 1:10. Self-examination. -- Ps 77:6. Lawful business. -- Pr 27:”
  5. Torrey's Topical Textbook “Torrey's Topical Textbook: Example of Christ, The — Is perfect -- Heb 7:26. Conformity to, required in Holiness. -- 1Pe 1:15,16; Ro 1:6. Righteousness. -- 1Jo 2:6. Purity. -- 1Jo 3:3. Love. -- Joh 13:34; Eph 5:2; 1Jo 3:16. Humility. -- Lu 22:27; Php 2:5,7. Meekness. -- Mt 11:29. Obedience. -- Joh 15:10. Self-denial. -- Mt 16:24; Ro 15:3. Ministering to others. -- Mt 20:28; Joh 13:14,15. Benevolence. -- Ac 20:35; 2Co 8:7,9. Forgiving injuries. -- Col 3:13. Overcoming the world. -- Joh 16:33; 1Jo 5:4. Being not of the world. -- Joh 17:16. Being guileless. -- 1Pe 2:21-22. Suffering wrongfully. --”
  6. Torrey's Topical Textbook “Torrey's Topical Textbook: Excellency and Glory of Christ, The — As God -- Joh 1:1-5; Php 2:6,9,10. As the Son of God -- Mt 3:17; Heb 1:6,8. As one with the Father -- Joh 10:30,38. As the First-born -- Col 1:15,18. As the First-begotten -- Heb 1:6. As Lord of lords, &c -- Re 17:14. As the image of God -- Col 1:15; Heb 1:3. As creator -- Joh 1:3; Col 1:16; Heb 1:2. As the Blessed of God -- Ps 45:2. As Mediator -- 1Ti 2:5; Heb 8:6. As Prophet -- De 18:15,16; Ac 3:22. As Priest -- Ps 110:4; Heb 4:15. As King -- Isa 6:1-5; Joh 12:41. As Judge -- Mt 16:27; 25:31,33. As Shepherd -- Isa 40:10,11; Joh”
  7. CCEL (Reformed) “Calvin, Commentary on Genesis, Vol. 1 (Gen 1-23), section 5.31: and fourteenth books on the Trinity, also the eleventh book of the “City of God.” I acknowledge, indeed, that there is something in man which refers to the Father and the Son, and the Spirit: and I have no difficulty in admitting the above distinction of the faculties of the soul: although the simpler division into two parts, which is more used in Scripture, is better adapted to the sound doctrine of piety; but a definition of the image of God ought to rest on a firmer basis than such subtleties. As for myself, before I define the”
  8. Philippians (Presbyterian) “Jamieson, Fausset & Brown on Philippians 2:6: Translate, "Who subsisting (or existing, namely, originally: the Greek is not the simple substantive verb, 'to be') in the form of God (the divine essence is not meant: but the external self-manifesting characteristics of God, the form shining forth from His glorious essence). The divine nature had infinite BEAUTY in itself, even without any creature contemplating that beauty: that beauty was 'the form of God'; as 'the form of a servant' (Phi 2:7), which is in contrasted opposition to it, takes for granted the existence of His human nature, so 'the”
  9. Colossians (Presbyterian) “Jamieson, Fausset & Brown on Colossians 1:15: They who have experienced in themselves "redemption" (Col 1:14), know Christ in the glorious character here described, as above the highest angels to whom the false teachers (Col 2:18) taught worship was to be paid. Paul describes Him: (1) in relation to God and creation (Col 1:15-17); (2) in relation to the Church (Col 1:18-20). As the former regards Him as the Creator (Col 1:15-16) and the Sustainer (Col 1:17) of the natural world; so the latter, as the source and stay of the new moral creation. image--exact likeness and perfect Representative.”
  10. Colossians (Presbyterian) “Jamieson, Fausset & Brown on Colossians 3:10: the new man--(See on Eph 4:23). Here (neon) the Greek, means "the recently-put-on nature"; that lately received at regeneration (see on Eph 4:23-24). which is renewed--Greek, "which is being renewed" (anakainottmenou); namely, its development into a perfectly renewed nature is continually progressing to completion. in knowledge--rather as the Greek, "unto perfect knowledge" (see on Col 1:6; Col 1:9-10). Perfect knowledge of God excludes all sin (Joh 17:3). after the image of him that created him--namely, of God that created the new man (Eph 2”
  11. CCEL/NPNF (Eastern Orthodox) “John Chrysostom, Homilies on 1 & 2 Corinthians: all: but admitting whatever is meet for God, e.g. that He is of the same essence, that He is of God; the things which are incongruous and belong to human weakness, leave thou upon the earth. Again, God is called “Light.” Shall we then admit all circumstances which belong to natural light? In no wise. For this light yields to darkness, and is circumscribed by space, and is moved by another power, and is overshadowed; none of which it is lawful even to imagine of That Essence. We will not however reject all things on this account, but will reap som”
  12. Colossians (Methodist/Wesleyan) “Adam Clarke on Colossians 3:10: And have put on the new man - See on Rom 12:1-2 (note). Is renewed in knowledge - Ignorance was the grand characteristic of the heathen state; Knowledge, of the Christian. The utmost to which heathenism could pretend was a certain knowledge of nature. How far this went, and how much it fell short of the truth, may be seen in the writings of Aristotle and Pliny. Christianity reveals God himself, the author of nature; or, rather, God has revealed himself, in the Christian system with which he has blessed mankind. Christianity teaches a man the true knowledge both ”
  13. Ephesians (Baptist/Reformed) “John Gill on Ephesians 4:6: One God and Father of all,.... That there is but one God is the voice of nature and of revelation; and may be concluded from the perfections of deity, for there can be but one eternal, infinite, immense, omnipotent, all-sufficient, perfect, and independent Being; and from one first cause of all things, and the relations he stands in to his creatures: there is but one God, who is truly, and really, and properly God, in opposition to all nominal and figurative deities, and which are not gods by nature, and to the fictitious deities and idols of the nations; and there ”
Ask Your Own Question