Definition and Usage of Rhema in Greek
The Greek term rhema (ῥῆμα) generally refers to a "word" or "utterance," often with an emphasis on the spoken aspect or a specific declaration. While it shares semantic range with logos (λόγος), which can also mean "word," "reason," or "discourse," rhema often highlights the individual, distinct word or a specific saying, rather than a broader concept or continuous speech. In biblical Greek, particularly the New Testament, rhema is used in various contexts to denote divine pronouncements, human speech, or specific commands.
One common distinction drawn by some theological traditions is that logos refers to the eternal, inherent Word of God (as in John 1:1, referring to Christ), or the entire body of God's revealed truth, while rhema refers to a specific, spoken word or an individual utterance from God that is applicable to a particular situation or person. However, this distinction is not consistently maintained in the biblical text itself, where the terms are sometimes used interchangeably [1]. For instance, both logos and rhema are used to describe the "word of God" that is preached (e.g., Acts 6:7 uses logos, while Romans 10:17 uses rhema).
In the Septuagint (the Greek translation of the Old Testament), rhema frequently translates the Hebrew word davar (דָּבָר), which also carries a broad meaning encompassing "word," "thing," "matter," or "event." This overlap in translation further illustrates that rhema can refer to a concrete reality or a specific occurrence, not just an abstract concept. For example, in Deuteronomy 8:3, "Man does not live on bread alone but on every rhema that comes from the mouth of the Lord," the emphasis is on the specific, life-sustaining pronouncements of God.
The New Testament usage of rhema can be categorized into several key areas:
Divine Utterances and Commands: Rhema is often used to describe words spoken directly by God or Christ. In Luke 1:37, the angel Gabriel tells Mary, "For no rhema from God will ever be impossible." Here, rhema signifies a divine promise or declaration. Similarly, in Matthew 4:4, quoting Deuteronomy 8:3, Jesus states that humans live "by every rhema that comes from the mouth of God," emphasizing the specific, life-giving words of divine origin. This usage highlights the power and authority inherent in God's spoken word.
Specific Sayings or Teachings: The term can also refer to particular sayings or teachings of Jesus or the apostles. In John 6:68, Peter declares to Jesus, "Lord, to whom shall we go? You have the rhema of eternal life." This refers to the specific teachings and pronouncements of Jesus that convey eternal life. In Ephesians 6:17, believers are encouraged to take "the sword of the Spirit, which is the rhema of God," implying the specific, active word of God that can be wielded in spiritual warfare. This suggests that rhema can be understood as the dynamic, applicable aspect of God's truth.
Human Speech and Declarations: While often associated with divine speech, rhema also describes human words, statements, or reports. In Luke 2:15, after the angels' announcement, the shepherds say to one another, "Let's go to Bethlehem and see this rhema that has happened, which the Lord has told us about." Here, rhema refers to the event or matter that was spoken of. In Romans 10:8, Paul speaks of "the rhema of faith that we are proclaiming," referring to the specific message of faith being preached. This demonstrates that rhema is not exclusively reserved for divine communication but can describe any specific utterance or matter.
The distinction between rhema and logos has been a point of discussion in various theological traditions. Some traditions emphasize a dynamic, personal application of rhema as a "now word" from God, distinct from the broader, general truth of logos. However, this distinction is not universally accepted and can sometimes lead to misinterpretations if not carefully contextualized within the broader biblical usage. The patristic writers, for instance, often used logos to refer to the divine Word as Christ, and rhema for specific utterances, but without a rigid, systematic separation that implies two different kinds of divine communication [1]. Clement of Alexandria, for example, discusses the "effluvia of roses and violets" and other natural phenomena, using language that implies specific, discernible effects, which aligns with the concrete nature often associated with rhema [1].
In rabbinic literature, the concept of a "word" (davar) often carries significant weight, encompassing not only speech but also action and decree. The Babylonian Talmud, for instance, frequently discusses the precise meaning and implications of specific words and phrases in legal and ritual contexts [2, 3, 4]. While the Talmud does not directly use rhema, its meticulous attention to the specific wording of laws and pronouncements reflects a similar concern for the concrete impact and meaning of individual utterances, much like the emphasis on the specific nature of rhema in Greek. The Talmud's discussions on the misuse of sacred items, for example, hinge on the precise understanding of terms and their application [5, 6].
Sources
- Schaff ANF/NPNF (Patristic) “ANF Vol 2: Hermas, Tatian, Theophilus, Athenagoras, Clement of Alexandria — CHAP. VIII.--ON THE USE OF OINTMENTS AND CROWNS. (part 7): in the nerves. And the effluvia of roses and violets being mildly cool, relieve and prevent headaches. But we who are not only not permitted to drink with others to intoxication, but not even to indulge in much wine? do not need the crocus or the flower of the cypress to lead us to an easy sleep. Many of them also, by their odours, warm the brain, which is naturally cold, volatilizing the effusions of the head. The rose is hence said to have received its name (”
- Babylonian Talmud (Jewish (Rabbinic)) “Babylonian Talmud, Gittin 19a.6: GEMARA: The Gemara begins by explaining the terms used in the mishna: Deyo refers to what is called deyota , ink, in Aramaic. Sam refers to samma , arsenic. With regard to sikra , Rabba bar bar Ḥana said: Its name in Aramaic is sikreta , red dye, derived from minium, which is also known as red lead. Komos , tree resin, is known as kuma in Aramaic. With regard to kankantom , Rabba bar bar Ḥana said that Shmuel said: This is the black substance used by cobblers, iron sulfate.”
- Babylonian Talmud (Jewish (Rabbinic)) “Babylonian Talmud, Gittin 181b.37:6: GEMARA: The Gemara begins by explaining the terms used in the mishna: Deyo refers to what is called deyota , ink, in Aramaic. Sam refers to samma , arsenic. With regard to sikra , Rabba bar bar Ḥana said: Its name in Aramaic is sikreta , red dye, derived from minium, which is also known as red lead. Komos , tree resin, is known as kuma in Aramaic. With regard to kankantom , Rabba bar bar Ḥana said that Shmuel said: This is the black substance used by cobblers, iron sulfate.”
- Babylonian Talmud (Jewish (Rabbinic)) “Babylonian Talmud, Gittin 181a.37:6: GEMARA: The Gemara begins by explaining the terms used in the mishna: Deyo refers to what is called deyota , ink, in Aramaic. Sam refers to samma , arsenic. With regard to sikra , Rabba bar bar Ḥana said: Its name in Aramaic is sikreta , red dye, derived from minium, which is also known as red lead. Komos , tree resin, is known as kuma in Aramaic. With regard to kankantom , Rabba bar bar Ḥana said that Shmuel said: This is the black substance used by cobblers, iron sulfate.”
- Babylonian Talmud (Jewish (Rabbinic)) “Babylonian Talmud, Keritot 57a.52:17: GEMARA: What is the term: His misuse, referring to, with regard to the halakha that is taught in the first clause of the mishna: If he purchased two rams for non-sacred use with those two sela designated for a guilt offering, if one of the rams is now worth two sela and the other one is worth ten dinars, the one that is worth two sela shall be sacrificed as his guilt offering and the second one shall be sacrificed for his misuse?”
- Babylonian Talmud (Jewish (Rabbinic)) “Babylonian Talmud, Keritot 26b.17: GEMARA: What is the term: His misuse, referring to, with regard to the halakha that is taught in the first clause of the mishna: If he purchased two rams for non-sacred use with those two sela designated for a guilt offering, if one of the rams is now worth two sela and the other one is worth ten dinars, the one that is worth two sela shall be sacrificed as his guilt offering and the second one shall be sacrificed for his misuse?”