BEREAN.AI ← Ask a Question

Distinguishing Principles from Parabolic Teachings in Scripture

Distinguishing between principles and parabolic teachings in Scripture involves understanding the nature and purpose of each. Principles represent foundational truths or doctrines, while parables are illustrative stories designed to convey these truths.

Biblical principles are often presented as direct statements of truth, forming the basis of Christian understanding and practice. The Scriptures themselves are described as "given by inspiration of God" and are referred to as the "Word of God" or "Holy Scriptures" [5]. These principles include core doctrines such as the resurrection, which is called a "first principle of the gospel" in 1 Corinthians 15:13-14 and Hebrews 6:1-2 [7]. The author of Hebrews exhorts believers to move beyond "the teaching of the first principles of Christ" to "perfection," indicating that these principles are foundational but not the entirety of spiritual growth [6]. John Gill, in his commentary on 1 Timothy 6:3, emphasizes that teaching "another doctrine" different from what the apostle taught, or from "that of the Bible, of Christ," is a deviation from sound principles [10]. Similarly, Jamieson, Fausset & Brown on Hebrews 13:9 warns against "divers" and "strange doctrines" that are "foreign to the truth" [11]. Jesus himself affirmed the "authority and principles of the Old Testament," stating he did not come "to destroy the law, or the prophets" [12].

Parables, on the other hand, are a specific teaching method. The Greek word parabole signifies "placing beside or together," a comparison, or a similitude [1]. In the Old Testament, the Hebrew mashal (similitude) could denote a proverb, a prophetic utterance, or an enigmatic saying [2]. In the New Testament, parabole can refer to a proverb, a typical emblem, or an allegory [2]. More specifically, parables are often understood as "a comparison of earthly with heavenly things," or "an illustration of one subject by another" [1, 2].

Jesus frequently used parables in his teaching. He explained that he spoke in parables "because seeing they don’t see, and hearing, they don’t hear, neither do they understand" [4]. This suggests parables served both to reveal truth to those with spiritual understanding and to obscure it from those without [4]. Tyndale House on Matthew 13:3 notes that parables are "stories that usually express an analogy between a common aspect of life and a spiritual truth" [8]. To understand a parable, one must identify the central analogy, consider its historical context, and understand its place within the Gospel narrative [8]. It is crucial to avoid finding "speculative allegorical meanings that were not intended in every element of a parable" [8].

A key distinction between parables and fables is that a parable "always relates what actually takes place, and is true to fact," while a fable does not [3]. Furthermore, parables teach "higher heavenly and spiritual truths," whereas fables typically convey "earthly moralities" [3]. The Bible contains only two examples of fables, such as that of the trees [3].

While principles are direct statements of truth, parables use narrative and analogy to convey those truths. For instance, the parable of the sower (Matthew 13:3-9) addresses the varied responses to Jesus' message, illustrating a spiritual principle about the reception of the Gospel [8]. Other parabolic teachings might employ hyperbolic imagery, such as Jesus' instruction about removing a "log" from one's own eye before addressing a "speck" in another's, which heightens the contrast for moral instruction [9].

In essence, principles are the foundational doctrines and ethical commands of Scripture, while parables are a pedagogical tool used to illuminate and apply these principles through relatable stories and comparisons.

Sources

  1. Smith's Bible Dictionary “Smith's Bible Dictionary: Parable — (The word parable is in Greek parable (parabole) which signifies placing beside or together, a comparison, a parable is therefore literally a placing beside, a comparison, a similitude, an illustration of one subject by another.--McClintock and Strong. As used in the New Testament it had a very wide application, being applied sometimes to the shortest proverbs, (1 Samuel 10:12; 24:13; 2 Chronicles 7:20) sometimes to dark prophetic utterances, (Numbers 23:7,18; 24:3; Ezekiel 20:49) sometimes to enigmatic maxims, (Psalms 78:2; Proverbs 1:6) or metaphors expand”
  2. Easton's Bible Dictionary “Easton's Bible Dictionary: Parable — (Gr. parabole), a placing beside; a comparison; equivalent to the Heb. mashal, a similitude. In the Old Testament this is used to denote (1) a proverb (1 Sam. 10:12; 24:13; 2 Chr. 7:20), (2) a prophetic utterance (Num. 23:7; Ezek. 20:49), (3) an enigmatic saying (Ps. 78:2; Prov. 1:6). In the New Testament, (1) a proverb (Mark 7:17; Luke 4:23), (2) a typical emblem (Heb. 9:9; 11:19), (3) a similitude or allegory (Matt. 15:15; 24:32; Mark 3:23; Luke 5:36; 14:7); (4) ordinarily, in a more restricted sense, a comparison of earthly with heavenly things, "an eart”
  3. Smith's Bible Dictionary “Smith's Bible Dictionary: Fable — A fable is a narrative in which being irrational, and sometimes inanimate, are, for the purpose of moral instruction, feigned to act and speak with human interests and passions.--Encyc. Brit. The fable differs from the parable in that-- + The parable always relates what actually takes place, and is true to fact, which the fable is not; and + The parable teaches the higher heavenly and spiritual truths, but the fable only earthly moralities. Of the fable, as distinguished from the parable [[510]Parable], we have but two examples in the Bible: + That of the tree”
  4. Matthew “Therefore I speak to them in parables, because seeing they don’t see, and hearing, they don’t hear, neither do they understand. -- Matthew 13:13”
  5. Torrey's Topical Textbook “Torrey's Topical Textbook: Scriptures, The — Given by inspiration of God -- 2Ti 3:16. Given by inspiration of the Holy Spirit -- Ac 1:16; Heb 3:7; 2Pe 1:21. Christ sanctioned, by appealing to them -- Mt 4:4; Mr 12:10; Joh 7:42. Christ taught out of -- Lu 24:27. Are called the Word. -- Jas 1:21-23; 1Pe 2:2. Word of God. -- Lu 11:28; Heb 4:12. Word of Christ. -- Col 3:16. Word of truth. -- Jas 1:18. Holy Scriptures. -- Ro 1:2; 2Ti 3:15. Scripture of truth. -- Da 10:21. Book. -- Ps 40:7; Re 22:19. Book of the Lord. -- Isa 34:16. Book of the law. -- Ne 8:3; Ga 3:10. Law of the Lord. -- Ps 1:2; Isa”
  6. Hebrews “Therefore leaving the teaching of the first principles of Christ, let us press on to perfection—not laying again a foundation of repentance from dead works, of faith toward God, -- Hebrews 6:1”
  7. Torrey's Topical Textbook “Torrey's Topical Textbook: Resurrection, The — A doctrine of the Old Testament -- Job 19:26; Ps 16:10; 49:15; Isa 26:19; Da 12:2; Ho 13:14. A first principle of the gospel -- 1Co 15:13,14; Heb 6:1,2. Expected by the Jews -- Joh 11:24; Heb 11:35. Denied by the Sadducees -- Mt 22:23; Lu 20:27; Ac 23:8. Explained away by false teachers -- 2Ti 2:18. Called in question by some in the church -- 1Co 15:12. Is not incredible -- Mr 12:24; Ac 26:8. Is not contrary to reason -- Joh 12:24; 1Co 15:35-49. Assumed and proved by our Lord -- Mt 22:29-32; Lu 14:14; Joh 5:28,29. Preached by the Apostles -- Ac 4:”
  8. Matthew (Protestant academic) “Tyndale House on Matthew 13:3: 13:3-9 This parable (interpreted in 13:18-23) addresses the mostly negative responses of the Jewish nation to Jesus and his message. • Parables (Greek parabolē) are stories that usually express an analogy between a common aspect of life and a spiritual truth. To understand a parable, it is necessary to locate the central analogy and understand it in its historical context and in the context of the Gospel text; then the central message can be understood. Speculative allegorical meanings that were not intended should not be found in every element of a parable.”
  9. Matthew (Protestant academic) “Tyndale House on Matthew 7:3: 7:3-5 Jesus exhorts his disciples to minister to others rather than condemning them. Reference to a speck (speck of dust, chip of wood) versus a log in the eye is hyperbolic imagery, intended to heighten the contrast (see 5:29; 23:23-24; cp. Mic 6:6-8).”
  10. 1 Timothy (Baptist/Reformed) “John Gill on 1 Timothy 6:3: If any man teach otherwise,.... Or another doctrine, as the Syriac version renders it; a doctrine different from what the apostle had now taught, concerning the duty of servants to their masters; as did the false teachers, who despised dominion or government; not only civil government, and so spoke evil of rulers and magistrates; and church government, and therefore reviled the apostles, elders, and pastors of churches; but family government, and encouraged disobedience to parents and masters; see Pe2 2:10 or teach another doctrine, from that of the Bible, of Chris”
  11. Hebrews (Presbyterian) “Jamieson, Fausset & Brown on Hebrews 13:9: about--rather, as oldest manuscripts read, "carried aside"; namely, compare Eph 4:14. divers--differing from the one faith in the one and the same Jesus Christ, as taught by them who had the rule over you (Heb 13:7). strange--foreign to the truth. doctrines--"teachings." established with grace; not with meats--not with observances of Jewish distinctions between clean and unclean meats, to which ascetic Judaizers added in Christian times the rejection of some meats, and the use of others: noticed also by Paul in Co1 8:8, Co1 8:13; Co1 6:13; Rom”
  12. Matthew (Presbyterian) “Jamieson, Fausset & Brown on Matthew 5:17: IDENTITY OF THESE PRINCIPLES WITH THOSE OF THE ANCIENT ECONOMY; IN CONTRAST WITH THE REIGNING TRADITIONAL TEACHING. (Mat. 5:17-48) Think not that I am come--that I came. to destroy the law, or the prophets--that is, "the authority and principles of the Old Testament." (On the phrase, see Mat 7:12; Mat 22:40; Luk 16:16; Act 13:15). This general way of taking the phrase is much better than understanding "the law" and "the prophets" separately, and inquiring, as many good critics do, in what sense our Lord could be supposed to meditate the subversion ”
Ask Your Own Question