Evaluating Non-Biblical Examples Against Biblical Authority
The Bible serves as the ultimate authority for Christian faith and practice, with non-biblical examples and human judgments evaluated against its teachings [2]. The apostle Paul, for instance, distinguished between his own judgment and a direct commandment from the Lord, indicating that while his judgment was inspired, it was not always a positive command in the same way as the Lord's direct will [2]. This highlights a principle where human recommendations, even from authoritative figures, are subject to the higher authority of divine revelation.
Christians are encouraged to use their own judgment to discern truth, but this private judgment must be exercised responsibly and in alignment with biblical principles [3]. The weakness of private judgment is not an argument against its use, but against its abuse [3]. For example, when considering participation in practices that might have pagan associations, Paul appealed to the Corinthians' own powers of judgment to understand that partaking in idol feasts implied fellowship with devils, contrasting it with the fellowship with Christ in the Lord's Supper [3].
Rebellion against God is consistently portrayed in scripture as a serious offense, manifesting in various forms such as unbelief, rejecting God's government, despising His law and counsels, distrusting His power, and murmuring against Him [1]. Such rebellion is seen as provoking God and even vexing the Holy Spirit [1]. Therefore, any non-biblical example or human tradition that encourages or embodies such rebellion would be in direct opposition to biblical authority.
The wisdom of the world, whether from "the wise," "the scribe," or "the disputer," is considered foolishness with God [4]. The Lord knows the thoughts of the wise, that they are vain [5]. This perspective underscores that human wisdom, when not aligned with divine wisdom, holds no ultimate authority. Instead, individuals are called to test themselves to see if Christ is in them, as a lack of Christ's presence would disprove their authenticity as Christians [6]. This self-examination, guided by biblical truth, is crucial for evaluating both personal conduct and external examples.
Sources
- Torrey's Topical Textbook “Torrey's Topical Textbook: Rebellion Against God — Forbidden -- Nu 14:9; Jos 22:19. Provokes God -- Nu 16:30; Ne 9:26. Provokes Christ -- Ex 23:20,21; 1Co 10:9. Vexes the Holy Spirit -- Isa 63:10. Exhibited in Unbelief. -- De 9:23; Ps 106:24,25. Rejecting his government. -- 1Sa 8:7; 15:23. Revolting from him. -- Isa 1:5; 31:6. Despising his law. -- Ne 9:26. Despising his counsels. -- Ps 107:11. Distrusting his power. -- Eze 17:15. Murmuring against him. -- Nu 20:3,10. Refusing to hearken to him. -- De 9:23; Eze 20:8; Zec 7:11. Departing from him. -- Isa 59:13. Rebellion against governors appoi”
- 1 Corinthians (Presbyterian) “Jamieson, Fausset & Brown on 1 Corinthians 7:25: no commandment of the Lord: yet . . . my judgment--I have no express revelation from the Lord commanding it, but I give my judgment (opinion); namely, under the ordinary inspiration which accompanied the apostles in all their canonical writings (compare Co1 7:40; Co1 14:37; Th1 4:15). The Lord inspires me in this case to give you only a recommendation, which you are free to adopt or reject--not a positive command. In the second case (Co1 7:10-11) it was a positive command; for the Lord had already made known His will (Mal 2:14-15; Mat 5:31-32). ”
- 1 Corinthians (Presbyterian) “Jamieson, Fausset & Brown on 1 Corinthians 10:15: Appeal to their own powers of judgment to weigh the force of the argument that follows: namely, that as the partaking of the Lord's Supper involves a partaking of the Lord Himself, and the partaking of the Jewish sacrificial meats involved a partaking of the altar of God, and, as the heathens sacrifice to devils, to partake of an idol feast is to have fellowship with devils. We cannot divest ourselves of the responsibility of "judging" for ourselves. The weakness of private judgment is not an argument against its use, but its abuse. We should t”
- 1 Corinthians (Presbyterian) “Jamieson, Fausset & Brown on 1 Corinthians 1:20: Where--nowhere; for God "brings them to naught" (Co1 1:19). the wise--generally. the scribe--Jewish [ALFORD]. the disputer--Greek [ALFORD]. Compare the Jew and Greek of this world contrasted with the godly wise, Co1 1:22-23. VITRINGA thinks the reference is to the Jewish discourses in the synagogue, daraschoth, from a Hebrew root "to dispute." Compare "questions," Act 26:3; Tit 3:9. If so, "wise" refers to Greek wisdom (compare Co1 1:22). Paul applies Isa 33:18 here in a higher sense; there the primary reference was to temporal deliverance”
- 1 Corinthians (Baptist/Reformed) “John Gill on 1 Corinthians 3:20: And again,.... Not in the same place, nor in the same book, but in the Psalms, in Psa 94:11. This form of citing Scriptures answers to and moreover, used by the Jewish doctors when the matter does not so clearly appear from the first proof, and therefore they produce another (q): and so here the apostle, for the further confirmation and illustration of this point, that the wisdom of this world is foolishness with God, to the testimony of Eliphaz, adds this of David, the Lord knoweth the thoughts of the wise, that they are vain; in the Psalms it is, "the Lord ”
- 2 Corinthians (Protestant academic) “Tyndale House on 2 Corinthians 13:5: 13:5-6 The issue is clear cut: If they cannot recognize that Jesus Christ is living among them, they are the ones who have failed the test of genuine faith (literally are disproved). There is a play on words here: They were looking for “proof” of Paul’s apostolic authority, but Paul urges them, Test yourselves (or Prove yourselves). The lack of Christ’s presence would disprove their authenticity as Christians. But Paul himself has demonstrated that he has not failed the test of apostolic authority (literally not been disproved).”