Importance of Using Biblical Examples Over Cultural Agenda
The Bible consistently presents examples and principles for human conduct, emphasizing that these divine standards should take precedence over shifting cultural norms. The concept of sin, for instance, is defined biblically rather than by societal acceptance. All human beings are born with a sinful nature [1], and the wicked indulge this nature, while the godly strive against it [1]. Sin is not merely an action but can also be understood as a corrupt nature that adheres to individuals even after conversion [7].
From the earliest accounts, the Bible illustrates the nature and consequences of sin. The first sin, committed by the first human pair, is described as a "heinous and aggravated" act, characterized by self-love, dishonor to God, ingratitude, and a preference for the creature over the Creator [4]. This initial transgression set a pattern, demonstrating that sin involves rebellion against God's commands [5]. The Old Testament frequently depicts God's anger as a necessary response to sin, predicting a decisive outpouring of wrath at the end of history [6]. Proverbs describes "vanity" as encompassing all sorts of sinful acts [2].
The New Testament further clarifies the pervasive nature of sin. Paul argues that both Gentiles and Jews are "equally under sin’s power" and cannot earn God's favor through their own actions [6]. The apostle John states that "He that committeth sin is of the devil," contrasting this with those who "do righteousness" [3]. Augustine, commenting on this passage, clarifies that one becomes a child of the devil not by birth but by imitating the devil, as "the devil begets none, nor does he create any" [3]. To claim "we have not sinned" is to make God a liar [7].
In contrast to cultural agendas, biblical teaching provides a framework for understanding righteousness and judgment. The principle that behavior merits judgment is a recurring theme, illustrated by the metaphor of a harvest where individuals reap what they sow [12]. While Jesus rejected simplistic judgments of individuals based on this principle, the underlying truth remains [12].
The Bible also provides guidance on how believers should live in light of these truths. Solomon, in Ecclesiastes, encourages turning to God and duty, advocating for adherence to religious rules rather than worldly ways [10]. The early disciples were called to be "the salt of the earth," implying a distinct influence on the world around them [9]. Believers are ultimately claimed by Christ and, in Him, by God [8]. This divine ownership implies a life lived according to God's standards rather than conforming to external cultural pressures. The building of the Church, even from ruins, demonstrates God's grace and His intention for a well-regulated community guided by His principles [11].
Sources
- Psalms (Protestant academic) “Tyndale House on Psalms 58:3: 58:3 All human beings are born sinners (see 51:5); however, whereas the wicked indulge their sinful nature, the godly fight against it (Rom 7:19-23; Jas 4:1-10).”
- Proverbs (Presbyterian) “Jamieson, Fausset & Brown on Proverbs 30:8: vanity--all sorts of sinful acts (Job 11:11; Isa 5:18).”
- 1 John (Presbyterian) “Jamieson, Fausset & Brown on 1 John 3:8: He that committeth sin is of the devil--in contrast to "He that doeth righteousness," Jo1 3:7. He is a son of the devil (Jo1 3:10; Joh 8:44). John does not, however, say, "born of the devil." as he does "born of God," for "the devil begets none, nor does he create any; but whoever imitates the devil becomes a child of the devil by imitating him, not by proper birth" [AUGUSTINE, Ten Homilies on the First Epistle of John, Homily 4.10]. From the devil there is not generation, but corruption [BENGEL]. sinneth from the beginning--from the time that any beg”
- Genesis (Presbyterian) “Jamieson, Fausset & Brown on Genesis 3:13: beguiled--cajoled by flattering lies. This sin of the first pair was heinous and aggravated--it was not simply eating an apple, but a love of self, dishonor to God, ingratitude to a benefactor, disobedience to the best of Masters--a preference of the creature to the Creator.”
- Psalms (Protestant academic) “Tyndale House on Psalms 19:13: 19:13 An individual who commits deliberate sins does so with an insolent (86:14) or arrogant (119:21, 69) attitude. • The great sin is rebellion (see 32:1).”
- Romans (Protestant academic) “Tyndale House on Romans 1:18: 1:18–3:20 Paul delays exploring the theme of righteousness through faith (see 3:21) until after he first teaches about universal sinfulness. Gentiles (1:18-32) and Jews (2:1–3:8) are equally under sin’s power and cannot find favor with God by any action of their own (3:9-20). 1:18 God’s anger is not a spontaneous emotional outburst, but the holy God’s necessary response to sin. The Old Testament often depicts God’s anger (Exod 32:10-12; Num 11:1; Jer 21:3-7) and predicts a decisive outpouring of God’s wrath on human sin at the end of history. While Paul usually de”
- 1 John (Presbyterian) “Jamieson, Fausset & Brown on 1 John 1:10: Parallel to Jo1 1:8. we have not sinned--referring to the commission of actual sins, even after regeneration and conversion; whereas in Jo1 1:8, "we have no sin," refers to the present GUILT remaining (until cleansed) from the actual sins committed, and to the SIN of our corrupt old nature still adhering to us. The perfect "have . . . sinned" brings down the commission of sins to the present time, not merely sins committed before, but since, conversion. we make him a liar--a gradation; Jo1 1:6, "we lie"; Jo1 1:8, "we deceive ourselves"; worst of al”
- 1 Corinthians (Protestant academic) “Tyndale House on 1 Corinthians 3:23: 3:23 Just as they may now claim everything as their own, so Christ has claimed them for himself (see Rom 14:7-9), and in Christ they are ultimately claimed by God (see 1 Cor 6:19-20; 7:23).”
- Matthew (Presbyterian) “Jamieson, Fausset & Brown on Matthew 5:13: We have here the practical application of the foregoing principles to those disciples who sat listening to them, and to their successors in all time. Our Lord, though He began by pronouncing certain characters to be blessed--without express reference to any of His hearers--does not close the beatitudes without intimating that such characters were in existence, and that already they were before Him. Accordingly, from characters He comes to persons possessing them, saying, "Blessed are ye when men shall revile you," &c. (Mat 5:11). And now, continuing t”
- Ecclesiastes (Nonconformist/Puritan) “Matthew Henry on Ecclesiastes 5:1: Solomon's design, in driving us off from the world, by showing us its vanity, is to drive us to God and to our duty, that we may not walk in the way of the world, but by religious rules, nor depend upon the wealth of the world, but on religious advantages; and therefore, I. He here sends us to the house of God, to the place of public worship, to the temple, which he himself had built at a vast expense. When he reflected with regret on all his other works (Ecc 2:4), he did not repent of that, but reflected on it with pleasure, yet mentions it not, lest he shou”
- CCEL (Reformed) “Calvin, Commentary on Genesis, Vol. 1 (Gen 1-23), section 3.7: its numbers, as if its dignity consisted in its multitude. If sometimes, in various places, Religion is less flourishing than could be wished, if the body of the pious is scattered, and the state of a well-regulated Church has gone to decay, not only do our minds sink, but entirely melt within us. On the contrary, while we see in this history of Moses, the building of the Church out of ruins, and the gathering of it out of broken fragments, and out of desolation itself, such an instance of the grace of God ought to raise us to firm”
- Job (Protestant academic) “Tyndale House on Job 4:8: 4:8 The harvest metaphor illustrates the scriptural principle that behavior merits judgment (Prov 22:8; Hos 8:7; Rom 2:9-11; Gal 6:7-8). The New Testament describes the final judgment as a harvest (Matt 13:39). Jesus rejected simplistic attempts to analyze people’s lives by this principle (Luke 13:4; John 9:1-3).”