Intersections and Informations Between Old and New Testaments
The terms "Old Testament" and "New Testament" refer to the two main divisions of the Christian Bible, with "testament" deriving from the Greek word diatheke, which is more accurately translated as "covenant" [2]. This distinction highlights the theological understanding of two covenants: an old covenant, often associated with the Mosaic Law, and a new covenant established through Jesus Christ [1, 11].
The Old Testament comprises a collection of sacred books that Christians regard as divinely inspired [5]. Its text was originally written on materials like skins, rolled into volumes [4]. The New Testament, on the other hand, is understood as the "gospel of Jesus Christ the Son of God," bringing "glad tidings" [9]. The concept of a "new covenant" is central to understanding the relationship between the two testaments. As described in Jeremiah 31:31-34, this new covenant differs from the old in that God's instructions would be written on the hearts of His people, emphasizing a vital, personal relationship rather than an external, legalistic one [11].
The New Testament frequently references and quotes the Old Testament, though not always according to a uniform method, as the Old Testament was not divided into chapters and verses as it is today when the New Testament was written [3]. For instance, Luke refers to Exodus 3:6 as "Moses at the bush," and Mark references 1 Samuel 21:1-6 as "in the days of Abiathar" [3]. These numerous quotations and allusions demonstrate a continuity of divine revelation [5].
The New Testament presents the new covenant as superseding the old covenant of works [1]. The author of Hebrews argues that God "made... old" the first covenant by speaking of a "new" one, implying its eventual abolition upon the introduction of the Gospel [6]. This contrast is further elaborated by depicting the old covenant, represented by Mount Sinai, as intimidating and unapproachable, while the new covenant, represented by Mount Zion, is relational and welcoming [12]. The death of Christ is understood as the means by which the new covenant is ratified, securing forgiveness and an eternal inheritance for those called [8].
The entire biblical narrative, from Genesis to Revelation, is seen by some as unified in Christ, with Genesis representing the "Alpha" of the Old Testament and Revelation the "Omega" of the New Testament, where "man and God [are] reconciled in Paradise" [7]. This overarching narrative underscores the belief that the Old Testament was intended to prepare for the institutions of the Gospel, with its excellent elements serving as types and representations of the New [10].
Sources
- Easton's Bible Dictionary “Easton's Bible Dictionary: New Testament — (Luke 22:20), rather "New Covenant," in contrast to the old covenant of works, which is superseded. "The covenant of grace is called new; it succeeds to the old broken covenant of works. It is ever fresh, flourishing, and excellent; and under the gospel it is dispensed in a more clear, spiritual, extensive, and powerful manner than of old" (Brown of Haddington). Hence is derived the name given to the latter portion of the Bible. (See [438]TESTAMENT.)”
- Easton's Bible Dictionary “Easton's Bible Dictionary: Testament — Occurs twelve times in the New Testament (Heb. 9:15, etc.) as the rendering of the Gr. diatheke, which is twenty times rendered "covenant" in the Authorized Version, and always so in the Revised Version. The Vulgate translates incorrectly by testamentum, whence the names "Old" and "New Testament," by which we now designate the two sections into which the Bible is divided. (See [629]BIBLE.)”
- Easton's Bible Dictionary “Easton's Bible Dictionary: Quotations — From the Old Testament in the New, which are very numerous, are not made according to any uniform method. When the New Testament was written, the Old was not divided, as it now is, into chapters and verses, and hence such peculiarities as these: When Luke (20:37) refers to Ex. 3:6, he quotes from "Moses at the bush", i.e., the section containing the record of Moses at the bush. So also Mark (2:26) refers to 1 Sam. 21:1-6, in the words, "in the days of Abiathar;" and Paul (Rom. 11:2) refers to 1 Kings ch. 17-19, in the words, "in Elias", i.e., in the port”
- Smith's Bible Dictionary “Smith's Bible Dictionary: Old Testament — I. TEXT OF THE OLD TESTAMENT.-- + History of the text. -A history of the text of the Old Testament should properly commence from the date of the completion of the canon. As regards the form in which the sacred writings were little doubt that the text was ordinarily were preserved, there can be written on skins, rolled up into volumes, like the modern synagogue rolls. (Psalms 40:7; Jeremiah 36:14; Ezekiel 2:9; Zechariah 5:1) The original character in which the text was expressed is that still preserved to us, with the exception of four letters, on the M”
- Easton's Bible Dictionary “Easton's Bible Dictionary: Scripture — Invariably in the New Testament denotes that definite collection of sacred books, regarded as given by inspiration of God, which we usually call the Old Testament (2 Tim. 3:15, 16; John 20:9; Gal. 3:22; 2 Pet. 1:20). It was God's purpose thus to perpetuate his revealed will. From time to time he raised up men to commit to writing in an infallible record the revelation he gave. The "Scripture," or collection of sacred writings, was thus enlarged from time to time as God saw necessary. We have now a completed "Scripture," consisting of the Old and New Testa”
- Hebrews (Presbyterian) “Jamieson, Fausset & Brown on Hebrews 8:13: he--God. made . . . old--"hath (at the time of speaking the prophecy) antiquated the first covenant." From the time of God's mention of a NEW covenant (since God's words are all realities) the first covenant might be regarded as ever dwindling away, until its complete abolition on the actual introduction of the Gospel. Both covenants cannot exist side by side. Mark how verbal inspiration is proved in Paul's argument turning wholly on the one word "NEW" (covenant), occurring but once in the Old Testament. that which decayeth--Greek, "that which is ”
- Revelation (Presbyterian) “Jamieson, Fausset & Brown on Revelation 1:8: Greek, "I am the Alpha and the Omega." The first and last letters of the alphabet. God in Christ comprises all that goes between, as well as the first and last. the beginning and the ending--omitted in the oldest manuscripts, though found in Vulgate and Coptic. Transcribers probably inserted the clause from Rev 21:6. In Christ, Genesis, the Alpha of the Old Testament, and Revelation, the Omega of the New Testament, meet together: the last book presenting to us man and God reconciled in Paradise, as the first book presented man at the beginning inn”
- Hebrews (Presbyterian) “Jamieson, Fausset & Brown on Hebrews 9:15: for this cause--Because of the all-cleansing power of His blood, this fits Him to be Mediator (Heb 8:6, ensuring to both parties, God and us, the ratification) of the new covenant, which secures both forgiveness for the sins not covered by the former imperfect covenant or testament, and also an eternal inheritance to the called. by means of death--rather, as Greek, "death having taken place." At the moment that His death took place, the necessary effect is, "the called receive the (fulfilment of the) promise" (so Luk 24:49 uses "promise"; Heb 6:15; ”
- Mark (Nonconformist/Puritan) “Matthew Henry on Mark 1:1: We may observe here, I. What the New Testament is - the divine testament, to which we adhere above all that is human; the new testament, which we advance above that which was old. It is the gospel of Jesus Christ the Son of God, Mar 1:1. 1. It is gospel; it is God's word, and is faithful and true; see Rev 19:9; Rev 21:5; Rev 22:6. It is a good word, and well worthy of all acceptation; it brings us glad tidings. 2. It is the gospel of Jesus Christ, the anointed Saviour, the Messiah promised and expected. The foregoing gospel began with the generation of Jesus Christ -”
- Hebrews (Nonconformist/Puritan) “Matthew Henry on Hebrews 9 (introduction): The apostle, having declared the Old Testament dispensation antiquated and vanishing away, proceeds to let the Hebrews see the correspondence there was between the Old Testament and the New; and that whatever was excellent in the Old was typical and representative of the New, which therefore must as far excel the Old as the substance does the shadow. The Old Testament was never intended to be rested in, but to prepare for the institutions of the gospel. And here he treats, I. Of the tabernacle, the place of worship (Heb 9:1-5). II. Of the worship and ”
- Jeremiah (Protestant academic) “Tyndale House on Jeremiah 31:32: 31:32-34 The key difference between the new covenant and the one God made with their ancestors is that the Lord would write his instructions deep within his people’s hearts (see Heb 10:16). The old covenant was external and legal, whereas the new covenant would be a vital, person-to-person relationship. The new covenant would emphasize the redeeming, transforming change of an individual’s spiritual nature.”
- Hebrews (Protestant academic) “Tyndale House on Hebrews 12:18: 12:18-24 This passage contrasts the old covenant with the new. The old covenant, represented by Mount Sinai (12:18-21), is depicted as impersonal, intimidating, and unapproachable; it booms, flashes, and terrifies. The new covenant, represented by Mount Zion (12:22-24), is depicted as relational, welcoming, and celebratory. 12:18 The descriptions of Mount Sinai come directly from God’s encounter with Israel at that mountain (see Exod 19:16-22; 20:18-21; Deut 4:11-12; 5:23-27). The images communicate separation from a holy God.”