Making Abstract Concepts of the Trinity Accessible Through Analogies
The use of analogies to explain the Trinity is a long-standing practice, though it presents theological challenges. The Nicene Creed articulates the doctrine of the Trinity, stating that Jesus Christ, the Son, is "begotten, not made, being of one substance with the Father" [5]. This emphasizes the co-equality and co-eternality of the divine persons, a concept difficult to grasp fully.
Augustine of Hippo, in his work On the Holy Trinity, acknowledged the difficulty in comprehending the divine nature and sought to guide readers through "outward sensible things" before moving to more abstract concepts [6]. He explored analogies within the human mind, suggesting that there is "something in man which refers to the Father and the Son, and the Spirit" [8]. However, Augustine also recognized the limitations of such comparisons, noting that a definition of the image of God should rest on a "firmer basis than such subtleties" [8].
Theologians across traditions have recognized the inherent limitations of analogies. John Calvin, for instance, in his commentary on Genesis, discusses the divine nature without relying on specific analogies for the Trinity itself [1, 3]. Similarly, John Chrysostom's homilies on various biblical books address aspects of God's nature but do not extensively employ analogies to explain the Trinity [2].
The Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Commentary on 2 Corinthians 13:14 highlights the Trinitarian benediction as proof of the "Divine Trinity in unity," noting that the varying order of the Persons in scripture (e.g., "grace of Christ," "love of God," "communion of the Holy Ghost") demonstrates that "in this Trinity none is afore or after other" [4]. This perspective, echoing the Athanasian Creed, underscores the co-equality of the divine persons, a point where many analogies fall short.
Thomas Aquinas, in his Summa Theologica, defended the use of metaphors in Holy Scripture, stating that "it is natural to man to attain to intellectual truths through sensible objects, because all our knowledge originates from sense" [7]. This principle supports the use of analogies to make complex theological concepts more accessible, even while acknowledging their imperfections. However, the challenge with Trinitarian analogies is that they often risk emphasizing one aspect of the Godhead at the expense of another, potentially leading to heresies such as modalism (one God appearing in three modes) or tritheism (three separate gods).
Sources
- CCEL (Reformed) “Calvin, Commentary on Genesis, Vol. 1 (Gen 1-23), section 28.1: Index of Scripture References Genesis 1:1-6 1:1-31 1:2 1:28 1:29-30 2:1 2:1-25 2:15 2:19 3:1 3:1-24 3:7 3:16 4:1 4:1-26 4:7 5:1 5:1-32 6:1 6:1-22 6:11-16 7:1-24 7:11 8:1-22 9:1 9:1 9:1-29 9:2 9:24 10 10:1 10:1 10:1-32 10:21 11:1 11:1 11:1-32 11:28 12:1 12:1 12:1 12:1-20 12:4 12:4 12:6 13:1 13:1-20 14:1-24 15:1-21 15:7 16:1-16 16:2 16:8 17:1 17:1 17:1 17:1 17:1-27 18:1 18:1 18:1-33 18:19 19:1-38 20:1 20:1 20:1-18 21:1-34 21:15 22:1-24 22:18 23:1-20 24:31 25:1 25:13-16 35:7 48:1 Exodus 6:3 12:40 Leviticus 7:18 17:4 18:25 Numbers 6:2”
- CCEL/NPNF (Eastern Orthodox) “John Chrysostom, Homilies on Galatians–Colossians–Thessalonians: Index of Scripture References Genesis 1:11 1:11 1:26 1:26 1:26 1:27 1:27 1:27 1:31 1:31 2:2 2:7 2:17 2:17 2:18 2:23 2:24 2:24 2:24 3:5 3:16 3:24 4 4:9 4:14 6:2 6:3 6:4 6:9 6:12 7:7 8:21 12:1 12:4 12:16 13:10 13:10-11 14:14 14:21-23 15:16 16:5 16:6 17:8 18:11 18:12 18:14 18:21 19:13 19:14 19:24 21:10 21:12 21:12 22:7-8 22:16 22:18 22:18 24:1-67 24:22 24:65 25:21 25:21 26:4 27:46 28:1 28:13 31:42 31:45 32:48 35:18 37:9-10 37:20 39:1 39:6 40:4 40:7 40:8 40:14-15 40:22 41 41:16 42:36 43:14 43:30 45:5 48:15-16 49:9 64:28 Exodus 2:11 2”
- CCEL (Reformed) “Calvin, Commentary on Isaiah, Vol. 1, section 23.4: 29:10 30:9 30:9 31:34 32:18 33:15 41:5 48:7 48:13 48:29 48:30 48:32 48:32 48:32 48:34 Lamentations 2:22 3:22 Ezekiel 4:16 13:9 18:20 20:22 34:23 34:23 36:25 37:11 37:12 37:16 37:24 37:24 47:1 47:1 Daniel 2:44 7:10 7:14 7:27 9:24 9:27 Hosea 2:5 2:13 2:18 2:19 2:20 2:23 3:4 3:5 6:6 13:11 14:2 14:9 Joel 2:31 2:32 2:32 Amos 2:4 2:5 3:11 5:11 5:18 5:20 5:21 6:11 9:11 9:11 Jonah 1:2 3:10 Micah 1:16 5:10 6:7 6:8 7:8 Habakkuk 1:16 2:2 2:2 Zephaniah 1:5 1:7 Haggai 2:9 Zechariah 2:8 2:8 3:2 6:12 Malachi 2:10 4:3 4:4 Matthew 1:5 3:2 4:15 4:16 5:10 5:11 ”
- 2 Corinthians (Presbyterian) “Jamieson, Fausset & Brown on 2 Corinthians 13:14: The benediction which proves the doctrine of the Divine Trinity in unity. "The grace of Christ" comes first, for it is only by it we come to "the love of God" the Father (Joh 14:6). The variety in the order of Persons proves that "in this Trinity none is afore or after other" [Athanasian Creed]. communion--joint fellowship, or participation, in the same Holy Ghost, which joins in one catholic Church, His temple, both Jews and Gentiles. Whoever has "the fellowship of the Holy Ghost," has also "the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ," and "the love”
- Nicene Creed (Ecumenical) “Nicene Creed (Ecumenical, 325/381 AD), Section 2: And in one Lord Jesus Christ, the only-begotten Son of God, begotten of the Father before all worlds; God of God, Light of Light, very God of very God; begotten, not made, being of one substance with the Father, by whom all things were made. Who, for us men and for our salvation, came down from heaven, and was incarnate by the Holy Spirit of the virgin Mary, and was made man; and was crucified also for us under Pontius Pilate; He suffered and was buried; and the third day He rose again, according to the Scriptures; and ascended into heaven, and”
- Schaff ANF/NPNF (Patristic) “NPNF1 Vol 3: Augustine — On the Holy Trinity — CHAP. 7.--THE THING IS MADE PLAIN BY AN EXAMPLE, IN WHAT WAY THE MATTER IS HANDLED IN ORDER TO HELP THE READER. (part 3): that I tried also, viz. in the eleventh book, to lead on the slowness of readers by means of outward sensible things which are seen by the eyes of the flesh; and that I then proceeded to enter with them upon that power of the tuner man whereby he reasons of things temporal, deferring the consideration of that which dominates as the higher power, by which he, contemplates things eternal. And I discussed this in two books, distin”
- theology (Catholic (Scholastic)) “Aquinas, Summa Theologica, First Part (Prima Pars), The Nature and Extent of Sacred Doctrine, Art. 9: Article: Whether Holy Scripture should use metaphors? I answer that, It is befitting Holy Writ to put forward divine and spiritual truths by means of comparisons with material things. For God provides for everything according to the capacity of its nature. Now it is natural to man to attain to intellectual truths through sensible objects, because all our knowledge originates from sense. Hence in Holy Writ, spiritual truths are fittingly taught under the likeness of material things. This is wha”
- CCEL (Reformed) “Calvin, Commentary on Genesis, Vol. 1 (Gen 1-23), section 5.31: and fourteenth books on the Trinity, also the eleventh book of the “City of God.” I acknowledge, indeed, that there is something in man which refers to the Father and the Son, and the Spirit: and I have no difficulty in admitting the above distinction of the faculties of the soul: although the simpler division into two parts, which is more used in Scripture, is better adapted to the sound doctrine of piety; but a definition of the image of God ought to rest on a firmer basis than such subtleties. As for myself, before I define the”