Paul's Warnings About Unworthy Communion Participation
Paul's Warnings About Unworthy Communion Participation
The apostle Paul's warnings about unworthy participation in the Lord's Supper are a subject of significant theological debate across Christian traditions. In 1 Corinthians 11:27, Paul writes, "Therefore whoever eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner will be guilty of the body and blood of the Lord" [1]. This passage has been interpreted in various ways, reflecting differing understandings of what constitutes "unworthy" participation and the consequences of such participation.
The disagreement centers on the nature of unworthy participation and its implications. Some traditions emphasize the importance of personal holiness and worthiness, while others stress the sacramental nature of the Eucharist and the role of faith in receiving it worthily.
Reformed and Presbyterian Perspectives
Reformed and Presbyterian traditions interpret Paul's warnings as emphasizing the need for self-examination before partaking in the Lord's Supper. According to John Calvin, those who participate without faith or charity "put every possible affront upon" Christ's body and "profane and contaminate it" by their reception [5]. Charles Hodge, representing the Old Princeton school, notes that worthy participation requires knowledge to discern the Lord's body, faith to feed upon Him, repentance, love, and a commitment to new obedience [7]. The Westminster Confession is often cited in this context, emphasizing the need for self-examination.
Lutheran Perspective
Lutheran tradition, as represented by the Augsburg Confession, views the Mass as a giving of the Sacrament and emphasizes the importance of communion. The Confession criticizes the profanation of the Mass for purposes of lucre and notes Paul's severe threats against those who deal unworthily with the Eucharist [2]. Lutheran theology tends to focus on the sacramental aspect and the real presence of Christ in the Eucharist.
Catholic (Scholastic) Perspective
Catholic Scholastic theology, as represented by Thomas Aquinas, distinguishes between open and secret sinners. According to Aquinas, Holy Communion ought not to be given to open sinners when they ask for it, citing Cyprian's letter on the matter [6]. This perspective emphasizes the role of the Church in determining worthiness to receive communion.
Eastern Orthodox Perspective
The Eastern Orthodox tradition, as represented by John of Damascus, emphasizes the importance of being in communion with Christ and with one another. John of Damascus warns against receiving communion from or granting it to heretics, lest one become partaker in their dishonor and condemnation [9].
Patristic and Anglican Perspectives
Patristic sources, such as Augustine, discuss the concept of not being partakers of other men's sins, emphasizing the importance of moral purity and the communal aspect of Christian worship [3, 4]. The Anglican tradition, as reflected in the Thirty-Nine Articles, states that the sacraments have a wholesome effect in those who receive them worthily, while unworthy reception leads to damnation [8].
Shared Ground
Despite these differences, all traditions agree on the importance of approaching the Lord's Supper with reverence and a commitment to living a life that honors Christ. The warnings in 1 Corinthians 11 are seen as a call to serious self-reflection and a reminder of the communal and sacramental nature of the Eucharist.
Divergence in Traditions
The divergence in interpreting Paul's warnings stems from differing hermeneutical commitments, such as the understanding of the sacrament, the role of faith, and the nature of worthiness. Historical contexts, such as the practices of the early Church and the controversies of the Reformation era, have also shaped these interpretations.
The various Christian traditions continue to grapple with the implications of Paul's warnings, reflecting a deep concern for the integrity of the Eucharist and the spiritual well-being of believers. The complexity of this issue underscores the richness and diversity of Christian thought on the Lord's Supper.
Sources
- 1 Corinthians (Presbyterian) “Jamieson, Fausset & Brown on 1 Corinthians 11:27: eat and drink--So one of the oldest manuscripts reads. But three or four equally old manuscripts, the Vulgate and CYPRIAN, read, "or." Romanists quote this reading in favor of communion in one kind. This consequence does not follow. Paul says, "Whosoever is guilty of unworthy conduct, either in eating the bread, or in drinking the cup, is guilty of the body and blood of Christ." Impropriety in only one of the two elements, vitiates true communion in both. Therefore, in the end of the verse, he says, not "body or blood," but "body and blood." An”
- Augsburg Confession (Lutheran) “Augsburg Confession (Lutheran, 1530), 10 But it is evident that for a long time this also has been the: 10 But it is evident that for a long time this also has been the public and most grievous complaint of all good men that Masses have been basely profaned and applied to purposes of lucre. 11 For it is not unknown how far this abuse obtains in all the churches by what manner of men Masses are said only for fees or stipends, and how many celebrate them contrary to the Canons. 12 But Paul severely threatens those who deal unworthily with the Eucharist when he says, 1 Cor. 11:27: Whosoever shall”
- Schaff ANF/NPNF (Patristic) “ANF Vol 5: Hippolytus, Cyprian, Caius, Novatian — TO THE CLERGY AND PEOPLE ABIDING IN SPAIN, CONCERNING BASILIDES AND MARTIAL. (part 7): of other men's sins who are associated with the delinquents. And besides, Paul the apostle writes, and says the same thing: "Whisperers, backbiters, haters of God, injurious, proud, boasters of themselves, inventors of evil things, who, although they knew the judgment of God, did not understand that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only they which commit those things, but they also which consent unto those who do these things."(5) Since ”
- Schaff ANF/NPNF (Patristic) “NPNF1 Vol 4: Augustine — Anti-Manichaean, Anti-Donatist — CHAP. 107.--242. PETILIANUS said: "And that none who is a layman may claim to be free from sin, they are all bound by this prohibition: 'Be not partakers of other men's sins.'": 243. AUGUSTIN answered: You are mistaken toto caelo, as the saying is, by reason of your pride, whilst, by reason of your humility, you are unwilling to communicate with the whole world. For, in the first place, this was not spoken to a layman; and, in the second place, you are wholly ignorant in what sense it was spoken. The apostle, writing to Timothy, gives t”
- CCEL (Reformed) “John Calvin, Institutes of the Christian Religion, section 99: and drinketh damnation to himself, not discerning the Lord’s body” ( 1 Cor. 11:27 , 29 ). For men of this description, who without any spark of faith, without any zeal for charity, rush forward like swine to seize the Lord’s Supper, do not at all discern the Lord’s body. For, inasmuch as they do not believe that body to be their life, they put every possible affront upon it, stripping it of all its dignity, and profane and contaminate it by so receiving; inasmuch as while alienated and estranged from their brethren, they dare to mi”
- theology (Catholic (Scholastic)) “Aquinas, Summa Theologica, Third Part (Tertia Pars), Of the Use or Receiving of This Sacrament in General, Art. 6: Article: Whether the priest ought to deny the body of Christ to the sinner seeking it? I answer that, A distinction must be made among sinners: some are secret; others are notorious, either from evidence of the fact, as public usurers, or public robbers, or from being denounced as evil men by some ecclesiastical or civil tribunal. Therefore Holy Communion ought not to be given to open sinners when they ask for it. Hence Cyprian writes to someone (Ep. lxi): "You were so kind as to ”
- CCEL (Reformed (Old Princeton)) “Charles Hodge, Systematic Theology, Vol. 3, section 68: this sacrament demands should exist in the heart, without producing supreme love and gratitude to Christ, and the fixed purpose to forsake all sin and to live devoted to his service. Our Church, therefore, teaches that it is required of them who would worthily partake of the Lord’s Supper, that they examine themselves, of their knowledge to discern the Lord’s body, of their faith to feed upon Him, of their repentance, love, and new obedience. It is, however, not to be inferred from this that a man must be assured that he is a true believe”
- Thirty-Nine Articles of Religion (Anglican) “Thirty-Nine Articles of Religion (Anglican, 1571), Section 264: The Sacraments were not ordained of Christ to be gazed upon, or to be carried about, but that we should duly use them. And in such only as worthily receive the same they have a wholesome effect or operation: but they that receive them unworthily purchase to themselves damnation, as Saint Paul saith.”
- CCEL (Eastern Orthodox) “John of Damascus, An Exact Exposition of the Orthodox Faith, section 89: For since we partake of one bread, we all become one body of Christ and one blood, and members one of another, being of one body with Christ. With all our strength, therefore, let us beware lest we receive communion from or grant it to heretics; Give not that which is holy unto the dogs, saith the Lord, neither cast ye your pearls before swine 2433 2433 St. Matt. vii. 6 . , lest we become partakers in their dishonour and condemnation. For if union is in truth with Christ and with one another, we are assuredly voluntarily ”