Role of Experience and Tradition in Biblical Hermeneutics
In biblical hermeneutics, both experience and tradition play significant roles in understanding and interpreting scripture. Experience, particularly the "knowing" that comes from lived relationship, is presented as fundamental to understanding God [4]. Tradition, encompassing the accumulated wisdom and interpretive frameworks of past generations, provides a context for contemporary interpretation [1].
The concept of "knowing" God in the Hebrew Bible, particularly in Exodus, is not merely an intellectual apprehension of facts but an experiential and relational understanding. The Hebrew word for "know" (יָדַע, yada') is used to describe intimate human relationships, such as sexual relations, indicating a deep, personal, and experiential knowledge [4]. To "know God as Yahweh" implies being in an ongoing relationship where one continually learns about God's character and desires. This experiential knowledge is presented as the true rescue from the human predicament of sin [4]. The importance of this relational knowing is underscored by its frequent recurrence in Exodus, particularly in chapters 5–18 [4].
The New Testament also emphasizes the role of experience. The testing or "trying" of faith through various temptations is understood to produce patience, and from this patience flows experience [6]. This process of testing and experience is seen as a means of proving one's Christian character [2]. For instance, the generosity of the Corinthians in their contributions is described as an "experimental proof" of their subjection to the Gospel [2]. This suggests that lived actions and the outcomes of faith in practice contribute to a deeper understanding and validation of one's spiritual state.
Tradition, while sometimes viewed with caution, also serves as a crucial guide. The author of Hebrews, for example, addresses believers who, "for the time," should have been teachers but instead needed to be retaught the "first principles" or "rudiments of the beginning" of Christian faith [5]. These foundational elements of Jewish instruction are presented as basic teachings from which believers are urged to move beyond, suggesting a progression in understanding that builds upon established tradition [7]. The Jamieson, Fausset & Brown commentary on Hebrews notes that the phrase "first principles" is Pauline, indicating a recognized body of foundational teaching [5].
However, tradition is not presented as an unquestionable authority. The Jamieson, Fausset & Brown commentary on Hebrews 3:9, when discussing the Israelites in the wilderness, explicitly states that "The authority of the ancients is not conclusive" [1]. This highlights a critical perspective on tradition, suggesting that while it offers valuable insights, it should not be followed blindly. The Israelites "tempted" and "proved" God by testing whether He was able and willing to relieve them, despite having seen His works for forty years [1]. Their experience, though extensive, did not lead them to repentance or full belief, demonstrating that even direct experience can be misinterpreted or fail to produce the desired spiritual outcome without proper understanding.
The Apostle Paul, in 2 Thessalonians, encourages believers to "stand fast" and "hold" to the traditions they have been taught, whether by word or by letter [3]. This instruction emphasizes the importance of preserving and adhering to the received teachings. The Jamieson, Fausset & Brown commentary interprets this as a call to not be "shaken or troubled" and to not "let go" of these traditions [3]. This highlights the role of tradition in providing stability and continuity in faith. The commentary also notes that God's sovereign choice of believers, far from leading to inaction, is a strong incentive for action and perseverance, illustrating a dynamic interplay between divine initiative and human responsibility within a framework of received teaching [3].
The interplay between experience and tradition is complex. While experience can deepen one's knowledge of God and validate faith, tradition provides a framework for understanding and interpreting that experience. The call to move beyond "first principles" in Hebrews suggests that tradition lays a foundation upon which further, more mature understanding can be built [7]. This implies a progressive hermeneutic where initial teachings are not discarded but are built upon and integrated with ongoing spiritual growth and experience. The process of growth is seen as initiated by God, suggesting a divine guidance in both the experiential and traditional aspects of understanding [7].
The biblical texts thus present a nuanced view. Experience is vital for a living, relational knowledge of God, moving beyond mere abstract facts [4]. Tradition provides the foundational teachings and interpretive lenses through which these experiences can be understood and integrated into a coherent faith [3, 7]. Yet, tradition is not absolute; it must be critically engaged, as the authority of the ancients is not always conclusive [1]. The goal is a mature understanding that incorporates both the lived reality of faith and the accumulated wisdom of the past, always progressing towards a deeper knowledge of Christ [7].
Sources
- Hebrews (Presbyterian) “Jamieson, Fausset & Brown on Hebrews 3:9: When--rather, "Where," namely, in the wilderness. your fathers--The authority of the ancients is not conclusive [BENGEL]. tempted me, proved me--The oldest manuscripts read, "tempted (Me) in the way of testing," that is, putting (Me) to the proof whether I was able and willing to relieve them, not believing that I am so. saw my works forty years--They saw, without being led thereby to repentance, My works of power partly in affording miraculous help, partly in executing vengeance, forty years. The "forty years" joined in the Hebrew and Septuagint”
- 2 Corinthians (Presbyterian) “Jamieson, Fausset & Brown on 2 Corinthians 9:13: by--through occasion of. experiment--Translate, "the experience" [ELLICOTT and others]. Or, "the experimental proof" of your Christian character, afforded by "this ministration." they--the recipients. for your professed subjection--Greek, "for the subjection of your profession"; that is, your subjection in accordance with your profession, in relation to the Gospel. Ye yield yourselves in willing subjection to the Gospel precepts, evinced in acts, as well as in profession. your liberal distribution--Greek, "the liberality of your contribu”
- 2 Thessalonians (Presbyterian) “Jamieson, Fausset & Brown on 2 Thessalonians 2:15: Therefore--God's sovereign choice of believers, so far from being a ground for inaction on their part, is the strongest incentive to action and perseverance in it. Compare the argument, Phi 2:12-13, "Work out your own salvation, FOR it is God which worketh in you," &c. We cannot fully explain this in theory; but to the sincere and humble, the practical acting on the principle is plain. "Privilege first, duty afterwards" [EDMUNDS]. stand fast--so as not to be "shaken or troubled" (Th2 2:2). hold--so as not to let go. Adding nothing, subtrac”
- Exodus (Protestant academic) “Tyndale House on Exodus 6:7: 6:7 Then you will know that I am the Lord: The Hebrew word translated know is always based on experience and relationship. The same word is used to describe human sexual relations. To know God as Yahweh is not just to know abstract facts about him, but to be in a relationship with him in which we are always learning who he is and what he wants us to do. This is the only true rescue from the human predicament of sin described in Gen 3–11. The importance of “knowing the Lord” in the book of Exodus is seen in its recurrence, especially in Exod 5–18 (5:2; 7:5, 17; 8:10”
- Hebrews (Presbyterian) “Jamieson, Fausset & Brown on Hebrews 5:12: for the time--considering the long time that you have been Christians. Therefore this Epistle was not one of those written early. which be the first principles--Greek, "the rudiments of the beginning of." A Pauline phrase (see on Gal 4:3; Gal 4:9). Ye need not only to be taught the first elements, but also "which they be." They are therefore enumerated Heb 6:1-2 [BENGEL]. ALFORD translates, "That someone teach you the rudiments"; but the position of the Greek, "tina," inclines me to take it interrogatively, "which," as English Version, Syriac, Vulga”
- James (Presbyterian) “Jamieson, Fausset & Brown on James 1:3: the trying--the testing or proving of your faith, namely, by "divers temptations." Compare Rom 5:3, tribulation worketh patience, and patience experience (in the original dokime, akin to dokimion, "trying," here; there it is experience: here the "trying" or testing, whence experience flows). patience--The original implies more; persevering endurance and continuance (compare Luk 8:15).”
- Hebrews (Protestant academic) “Tyndale House on Hebrews 6:1: 6:1-3 In light of the hearers’ immaturity (5:11-14), the author urges them to move beyond basic teachings. The six basic teachings here were all foundational elements of Jewish instruction. The author might be challenging them to move beyond these basic teachings to further understanding about the person of Christ, which he elaborates in 7:1–10:25. 6:1 Let us go on: Or Let us be carried on, suggesting that God initiates growth to maturity (Phil 2:12-13) and that it is an ongoing process. • Repenting and faith are the basic commitments that initiate a person to the”