Sovereign Grace View on Calling and Election

The concepts of calling and election are central to Christian theology, yet their precise nature and relationship are subjects of significant debate across various traditions. The core of the disagreement often revolves around the extent of divine sovereignty and human agency in salvation, particularly concerning who God chooses and how individuals respond to that choice.

One prominent perspective, often termed the "Sovereign Grace" view and articulated within Reformed and Presbyterian traditions, emphasizes God's unconditional election of individuals to eternal life. This view holds that God, in His sovereign good pleasure, chooses certain individuals for salvation before the foundation of the world, not based on any foreseen merit or faith in them ^{[1, 5]}. Augustine, a key patristic figure, argued that election is entirely of grace, not merit. He contended that those who are elected are provided with the means to hear the Gospel, believe, and persevere in faith, and that this calling is not because they have believed, but in order that they may believe ^{[6, 8]}. John Calvin similarly asserted that God's election is secret but manifested through effectual calling, which is founded on God's free mercy ^[11]. He maintained that God removes the "stony heart" and gives a "heart of flesh," enabling belief, and that God teaches whom He wills in mercy, while those He does not teach are left in judgment ^[10]. Charles Hodge, representing Old Princeton Reformed theology, affirmed that God, as sovereign, claims the prerogative to have mercy on whom He will, citing examples like Isaac over Ishmael and Jacob over Esau, where the choice was announced before their birth to demonstrate its sovereign nature ^[5]. This perspective often interprets passages like Ephesians 1:4 ("He chose us in him before the foundation of the world") and 2 Thessalonians 2:13 ("God chose you from the beginning for salvation") as evidence of this unconditional election ^[1]. The effectual call, in this view, is an internal work of the Holy Spirit that enables a spiritually dead individual to respond to the gospel, much like a bodily resurrection is a work of divine omnipotence ^[7].

Another perspective, often associated with Wesleyan-Methodist theology, emphasizes God's foreknowledge in election while still affirming grace. Adam Clarke, a Methodist commentator, interprets Romans 11:6 to mean that God's election of grace takes in all who believe in Jesus Christ, suggesting that election is "according to the election of grace, or the rule of choosing any persons to be the people of God upon the footing of grace" ^[9]. This view often understands "foreknowledge" in passages like 1 Peter 1:2 ("Elect according to the foreknowledge of God the Father") as God's prior knowledge of who will respond to His grace, rather than an unconditional decree irrespective of human choice ^{[2, 3]}. While acknowledging God's initiative, this position typically allows for a greater role for human free will in responding to the divine call.

A third position, sometimes found within broader evangelicalism, seeks to balance divine sovereignty and human responsibility without fully embracing either the unconditional election of Reformed theology or the strong emphasis on foreknowledge of foreseen faith. This view might highlight that God's election is indeed a divine act, but that the call to salvation is genuinely extended to all, and individuals are responsible for their response. The "calling" can be understood in different ways: an external call through the ministry of the word, or an internal, effectual call by special grace ^[4]. The exhortation to "make your calling and election sure" (2 Peter 1:10) is interpreted as a call to diligence in Christian living, demonstrating the reality of one's election through good works and spiritual growth ^{[4, 12]}. The Anglican Thirty-Nine Articles of Religion, while affirming predestination and election as a source of comfort for the godly, also caution against curious and carnal persons misusing the doctrine ^[13].

Despite these divergences, traditions generally agree that salvation is ultimately a work of God's grace and that human beings cannot earn their salvation through their own efforts. All positions acknowledge that God initiates the process of salvation and that the Holy Spirit plays a crucial role in bringing individuals to faith. The divergence often stems from differing hermeneutical approaches to passages that speak of God's choice and human response, as well as underlying philosophical assumptions about the nature of human freedom and divine omnipotence. The question of whether God's election is based on His unconditioned will or His foreknowledge of human choice remains a central point of theological distinction.

Sources

Easton's Bible Dictionary “Easton's Bible Dictionary: Election of Grace — The Scripture speaks (1) of the election of individuals to office or to honour and privilege, e.g., Abraham, Jacob, Saul, David, Solomon, were all chosen by God for the positions they held; so also were the apostles. (2) There is also an election of nations to special privileges, e.g., the Hebrews (Deut. 7:6; Rom. 9:4). (3) But in addition there is an election of individuals to eternal life (2 Thess. 2:13; Eph. 1:4; 1 Pet. 1:2; John 13:18). The ground of this election to salvation is the good pleasure of God (Eph. 1:5, 11; Matt. 11:25, 26; John 15”
I Peter “I Peter 1:2 (Geneva1599) — Elect according to the foreknowledge of God ye Father vnto sanctification of ye Spirit, through obedience and sprinkeling of the blood of Iesus Christ: Grace and peace bee multiplied vnto you.”
King James Version “[KJV] 1 Peter 1:2 — Elect according to the foreknowledge of God the Father, through sanctification of the Spirit, unto obedience and sprinkling of the blood of Jesus Christ: Grace unto you, and peace, be multiplied.”
2 Peter (Baptist/Reformed) “John Gill on 2 Peter 1:10: Wherefore the rather, brethren, give diligence,.... To exercise the afore mentioned graces, and to perform the above duties, since this is the way to make your calling and election sure; by calling is not meant a call to any office in the church, nor an external call, either by the voice of nature, or by the ministry of the word; but an internal and effectual call by special grace, to grace here, and glory hereafter; instead of "calling", the Alexandrian copy reads, "comfort": and by "election" is meant, not a national, nor church election, but a particular and per”
CCEL (Reformed (Old Princeton)) “Charles Hodge, Systematic Theology, Vol. 2, section 66: a prerogative which God, as sovereign, claimed and exercised 344 to have mercy on whom He would, and to reject whom He would. He chose Isaac and not Ishmael, Jacob and not Esau, and, in that case, to show that the choice was perfectly sovereign, it was announced before the birth of the children, before they had done good or evil. Pharaoh He had hardened. He left him to himself to be a monument of justice. This right, which God both claims and exercises, to choose whom He will to be the recipients of his mercy, involves, the Apostle teache”
Schaff ANF/NPNF (Patristic) “NPNF1 Vol 5: Augustine — Anti-Pelagian — CHAP. 13.--ELECTION IS OF GRACE, NOT OF MERIT.: Whosoever, then, are made to differ from that original condemnation by such bounty of divine 477 grace, there is no doubt but that for such it is provided that they should hear the gospel, and when they hear they believe, and in the faith which worketh by love they persevere unto the end; and if, perchance, they deviate from the way, when they are rebuked they are amended and some of them, although they may not be rebuked by men, return into the path which they had left; and some who have received grace in”
CCEL (Reformed (Old Princeton)) “Charles Hodge, Systematic Theology, Vol. 2, section 140: renewed by the Holy Spirit, he is thereby enabled to answer this call, and to embrace the grace offered and conveyed in it.” 531 531 Ibid. x. § 2. If man is as really spiritually dead, in his natural state since the fall, as Lazarus was corporeally dead, then is the spiritual resurrection of the one as really a work of divine omnipotence as the bodily resurrection of the other. These doctrines, therefore, thus logically connected, have never in fact been dissociated. All who hold that original sin involves spiritual death and consequent ”
Schaff ANF/NPNF (Patristic) “NPNF1 Vol 5: Augustine — Anti-Pelagian — CHAP. 34 [XVII.]--THE SPECIAL CALLING OF THE ELECT IS NOT BECAUSE THEY HAVE BELIEVED, BUT IN ORDER THAT THEY MAY BELIEVE. (part 1): Let us, then, understand the calling whereby 515 they become elected,--not those who are elected because they have believed, but who are elected that they may believe. For the Lord Himself also sufficiently explains this calling when He says, "Ye have not chosen me, but I have chosen you."(1) For if they had been elected because they had believed, they themselves would certainly have first chosen Him by believing in Him, so”
Romans (Methodist/Wesleyan) “Adam Clarke on Romans 11:6: And if by grace - And let this very remnant of pious Jews, who have believed in Christ Jesus, know that they are brought in, precisely in the same way as God has brought in the Gentiles; the one having no more worthiness to plead than the other; both being brought in, and continued in by God's free grace, and not by any observance of the Mosaic law. And this is done according to the election of grace, or the rule of choosing any persons to be the people of God upon the footing of grace; which takes in all that believe in his Son Jesus Christ: some of the Jewish peop”
CCEL (Reformed) “John Calvin, Institutes of the Christian Religion, section 79: 2241 received by any hard heart; for the reason for which it is given is, that the hardness of the heart may first be taken away. Hence, when the Father is heard within, he takes away the stony heart, and gives a heart of flesh. Thus he makes them sons of promise and vessels of mercy, which he has prepared for glory. Why then does he not teach all to come to Christ, but just because all whom he teaches he teaches in mercy, while those whom he teaches not he teaches not in judgment? for he pities whom he will, and hardens whom he wi”
CCEL (Reformed) “John Calvin, Institutes of the Christian Religion, section 79: 2239 CHAPTER 24. ELECTION CONFIRMED BY THE CALLING OF GOD. THE REPROBATE BRING UPON THEMSELVES THE RIGHTEOUS DESTRUCTION TO WHICH THEY ARE DOOMED. The title of this chapter shows that it consists of two parts,—I. The case of the Elect, from sec. 1-11. II. The case of the Reprobate, from sec. 12-17. Sections . 1. The election of God is secret, but is manifested by effectual calling. The nature of this effectual calling. How election and effectual calling are founded on the free mercy of God. A cavil of certain expositors refuted by ”
2 Peter (Presbyterian) “Jamieson, Fausset & Brown on 2 Peter 1:10: Wherefore--seeking the blessed consequence of having, and the evil effects of not having, these graces (Pe2 1:8-9). the rather--the more earnestly. brethren--marking that it is affection for them which constrains him so earnestly to urge them. Nowhere else does he so address them, which makes his calling them so here the more emphatical. give diligence--The Greek aorist implies one lifelong effect [ALFORD]. to make--Greek middle voice; to make so far as it depends on you; to do your part towards making. "To make" absolutely and finally is God'”
Thirty-Nine Articles of Religion (Anglican) “Thirty-Nine Articles of Religion (Anglican, 1571), Section 242: As the godly consideration of Predestination, and our Election in Christ, is full of sweet, pleasant, and unspeakable comfort to godly persons, and such as feel in themselves the working of the Spirit of Christ, mortifying the works of the flesh, and their earthly members, and drawing up their mind to high and heavenly things, as well because it doth greatly establish and confirm their faith of eternal Salvation to be enjoyed through Christ, as because it doth fervently kindle their love towards God: So, for curious and carnal per”

Ask Your Own Question