BEREAN.AI ← Ask a Question

Testing Analogies and Examples Against Scripture's Teaching

The Bible is considered by many traditions to be the inspired Word of God, given through the Holy Spirit [1]. As such, it serves as the ultimate authority for Christian faith and practice. When evaluating analogies, examples, or teachings, they must be tested against the consistent message of Scripture [7].

Scripture itself provides examples of how to approach and interpret its teachings. For instance, the apostle Paul often illustrated Gospel mysteries by comparing them with Old Testament types, and conversely, expounded Spirit-inspired Old Testament Scripture by comparing it with the Gospel [6]. This method of "comparing spiritual things with spiritual" highlights the internal consistency and self-interpreting nature of the biblical text [6].

Jesus frequently appealed to the Scriptures, teaching out of them and sanctioning their authority [1]. He contrasted his own teaching with misinterpretations of the law, revealing God's will as it stood against human traditions [7]. This demonstrates that even long-held interpretations or examples must yield to the clear teaching of Christ and the written Word [7].

The concept of "parable" in the New Testament, derived from the Greek parabole, signifies a comparison, similitude, or illustration of one subject by another [2]. While parables and analogies are valuable teaching tools, their meaning and application are always rooted in the broader biblical narrative and theological framework. For example, when God "tempts" or "proves" individuals, as in the case of Abraham or Peter, it is not to gain knowledge He lacks, but to test their obedience and reveal their character [5]. Analogies about God's actions must therefore align with His known attributes and purposes as revealed in Scripture [5].

Furthermore, the Bible warns against those who deny Christ "in doctrine" or "in practice," characterizing such denial as the "spirit of Antichrist" [3]. This underscores the importance of ensuring that any analogy or example does not contradict core biblical doctrines. Rebellion against God, often exhibited through unbelief, rejecting His government, or despising His law, is consistently forbidden and shown to provoke God [4]. Therefore, any teaching that encourages such rebellion, even implicitly through an analogy, would be contrary to Scripture.

Sources

  1. Torrey's Topical Textbook “Torrey's Topical Textbook: Scriptures, The — Given by inspiration of God -- 2Ti 3:16. Given by inspiration of the Holy Spirit -- Ac 1:16; Heb 3:7; 2Pe 1:21. Christ sanctioned, by appealing to them -- Mt 4:4; Mr 12:10; Joh 7:42. Christ taught out of -- Lu 24:27. Are called the Word. -- Jas 1:21-23; 1Pe 2:2. Word of God. -- Lu 11:28; Heb 4:12. Word of Christ. -- Col 3:16. Word of truth. -- Jas 1:18. Holy Scriptures. -- Ro 1:2; 2Ti 3:15. Scripture of truth. -- Da 10:21. Book. -- Ps 40:7; Re 22:19. Book of the Lord. -- Isa 34:16. Book of the law. -- Ne 8:3; Ga 3:10. Law of the Lord. -- Ps 1:2; Isa”
  2. Smith's Bible Dictionary “Smith's Bible Dictionary: Parable — (The word parable is in Greek parable (parabole) which signifies placing beside or together, a comparison, a parable is therefore literally a placing beside, a comparison, a similitude, an illustration of one subject by another.--McClintock and Strong. As used in the New Testament it had a very wide application, being applied sometimes to the shortest proverbs, (1 Samuel 10:12; 24:13; 2 Chronicles 7:20) sometimes to dark prophetic utterances, (Numbers 23:7,18; 24:3; Ezekiel 20:49) sometimes to enigmatic maxims, (Psalms 78:2; Proverbs 1:6) or metaphors expand”
  3. Torrey's Topical Textbook “Torrey's Topical Textbook: Denial of Christ — In doctrine -- Mr 8:38; 2Ti 1:8. In practice -- Php 3:18,10; Tit 1:16. A characteristic of false teachers -- 2Pe 2:1; Jude 1:4. Is the spirit of Antichrist -- 1Jo 2:22,23; 4:3. Christ will deny those guilty of -- Mt 10:33; 2Ti 2:12. Leads to destruction -- 2Pe 2:1; Jude 1:4,15. Exemplified Peter. -- Mt 26:69-75. The Jews. -- Joh 18:40; Ac 3:13,14.”
  4. Torrey's Topical Textbook “Torrey's Topical Textbook: Rebellion Against God — Forbidden -- Nu 14:9; Jos 22:19. Provokes God -- Nu 16:30; Ne 9:26. Provokes Christ -- Ex 23:20,21; 1Co 10:9. Vexes the Holy Spirit -- Isa 63:10. Exhibited in Unbelief. -- De 9:23; Ps 106:24,25. Rejecting his government. -- 1Sa 8:7; 15:23. Revolting from him. -- Isa 1:5; 31:6. Despising his law. -- Ne 9:26. Despising his counsels. -- Ps 107:11. Distrusting his power. -- Eze 17:15. Murmuring against him. -- Nu 20:3,10. Refusing to hearken to him. -- De 9:23; Eze 20:8; Zec 7:11. Departing from him. -- Isa 59:13. Rebellion against governors appoi”
  5. CCEL/NPNF (Eastern Orthodox) “John Chrysostom, Homilies on Acts & Romans: tempt Abraham, so He was putting Peter to the proof whether he would obey the call to the Gentiles, as if Peter understood the vision in that sense. Had he so understood the command, “Kill and eat,” he would not have objected; for he could not be either ignorant or unwilling. But he did not so understand it, and his objection was solely to the matter of eating. And as he needed not the lesson (it was intended for others): so neither did God need to learn his willingness. When God tempts, or proves, it is not to learn something that He did not know be”
  6. 1 Corinthians (Presbyterian) “Jamieson, Fausset & Brown on 1 Corinthians 2:13: also--We not only know by the Holy Ghost, but we also speak the "things freely given to us of God" (Co1 2:12). which the Holy Ghost teacheth--The old manuscripts read "the Spirit" simply, without "Holy." comparing spiritual things with spiritual--expounding the Spirit-inspired Old Testament Scripture, by comparison with the Gospel which Jesus by the same Spirit revealed [GROTIUS]; and conversely illustrating the Gospel mysteries by comparing them with the Old Testament types [CHRYSOSTOM]. So the Greek word is translated, "comparing" (Co2 10:”
  7. Matthew (Protestant academic) “Tyndale House on Matthew 5:21: 5:21-47 You have heard. . . . But I say: Jesus contrasts his own teaching to six misinterpretations of the law. Each antithesis provides an example of the surpassing righteousness of Jesus. Jesus reveals the will of God as it contrasts with traditions. 5:21 our ancestors were told: The expression refers to the traditional interpretation of the teachers of religious law and Pharisees. Though their traditions prohibited murder, they did not prohibit hatred. The surpassing righteousness of Jesus demands reconciliation (5:23-24); merely refraining from committing mur”
Ask Your Own Question