Using Non-Biblical Examples to Illustrate Biblical Truths Effectively
Using Non-Biblical Examples to Illustrate Biblical Truths
The Bible itself employs non-biblical examples to illustrate spiritual truths, a practice that has been continued by Christian teachers and theologians throughout history. For instance, the concept of parables, as seen in the teachings of Jesus, involves using everyday, non-biblical examples to convey deeper spiritual meanings [1].
The use of non-biblical examples can be seen in various biblical contexts. In the Psalms, for example, the psalmist draws on natural imagery to describe the character of the righteous and the wicked (Psalms 1, 58:3) [2]. Similarly, the book of Proverbs uses observations about the natural world and human behavior to teach moral lessons (Proverbs 30:8) [3].
Christian theologians and commentators have also employed non-biblical examples to illustrate biblical truths. For example, Augustine uses the concept of imitation to explain how individuals become "children of the devil" by imitating his sinful behavior, rather than being born of him (1 John 3:8) [4]. Calvin, in his commentary on Genesis, highlights the importance of understanding the historical and cultural context of the biblical narrative to derive valuable insights into God's grace and the nature of the Church [5, 10].
The practice of using non-biblical examples to illustrate biblical truths is not limited to biblical interpretation. Christian writers and preachers have long used illustrations from everyday life, literature, and philosophy to make biblical teachings more accessible and understandable. For instance, Adam Clarke, a Methodist commentator, notes that the apostle Paul's preaching was characterized by simplicity and a lack of "excellency of speech," emphasizing the importance of the message over the eloquence of the messenger (1 Corinthians 2:1) [7].
The effectiveness of using non-biblical examples to illustrate biblical truths lies in their ability to make complex theological concepts more relatable and engaging. By drawing on a wide range of sources, including literature, history, and everyday experience, Christian teachers and writers can convey the relevance and power of biblical teachings to diverse audiences.
The Reformed tradition, as represented by Calvin, emphasizes the importance of understanding the biblical text within its historical and cultural context, while also recognizing the value of using non-biblical examples to illustrate its teachings [6, 8, 9]. This approach allows for a nuanced and contextualized understanding of biblical truths, making them more accessible to a broader audience.
Sources
- Smith's Bible Dictionary “Smith's Bible Dictionary: Parable — (The word parable is in Greek parable (parabole) which signifies placing beside or together, a comparison, a parable is therefore literally a placing beside, a comparison, a similitude, an illustration of one subject by another.--McClintock and Strong. As used in the New Testament it had a very wide application, being applied sometimes to the shortest proverbs, (1 Samuel 10:12; 24:13; 2 Chronicles 7:20) sometimes to dark prophetic utterances, (Numbers 23:7,18; 24:3; Ezekiel 20:49) sometimes to enigmatic maxims, (Psalms 78:2; Proverbs 1:6) or metaphors expand”
- Psalms (Protestant academic) “Tyndale House on Psalms 58:3: 58:3 All human beings are born sinners (see 51:5); however, whereas the wicked indulge their sinful nature, the godly fight against it (Rom 7:19-23; Jas 4:1-10).”
- Proverbs (Presbyterian) “Jamieson, Fausset & Brown on Proverbs 30:8: vanity--all sorts of sinful acts (Job 11:11; Isa 5:18).”
- 1 John (Presbyterian) “Jamieson, Fausset & Brown on 1 John 3:8: He that committeth sin is of the devil--in contrast to "He that doeth righteousness," Jo1 3:7. He is a son of the devil (Jo1 3:10; Joh 8:44). John does not, however, say, "born of the devil." as he does "born of God," for "the devil begets none, nor does he create any; but whoever imitates the devil becomes a child of the devil by imitating him, not by proper birth" [AUGUSTINE, Ten Homilies on the First Epistle of John, Homily 4.10]. From the devil there is not generation, but corruption [BENGEL]. sinneth from the beginning--from the time that any beg”
- Genesis (Presbyterian) “Jamieson, Fausset & Brown on Genesis 3:13: beguiled--cajoled by flattering lies. This sin of the first pair was heinous and aggravated--it was not simply eating an apple, but a love of self, dishonor to God, ingratitude to a benefactor, disobedience to the best of Masters--a preference of the creature to the Creator.”
- CCEL (Reformed) “Calvin, Commentary on Genesis, Vol. 1 (Gen 1-23), section 1.5: more recently been subjected. Still his verbal criticisms are neither few nor unimportant, though he lays comparatively little stress upon them himself. 5 5 The reader is referred, for full information on this subject, to a small volume entitled, “The Merits of Calvin as an Interpreter of the Holy Scriptures,” by Professor Tholuck of Halle. To which are added, “Opinions and Testimonies of Foreign and British Divines and Scholars as to the Importance of the Writings of John Calvin.” With a Preface by the Revelation William Pringle. ”
- 1 Corinthians (Methodist/Wesleyan) “Adam Clarke on 1 Corinthians 2:1: When I came to you - Acting suitably to my mission, which was to preach the Gospel, but not with human eloquence, Co1 1:17. I declared to you the testimony, the Gospel, of God, not with excellency of speech, not with arts of rhetoric, used by your own philosophers, where the excellence of the speech recommends the matter, and compensates for the want of solidity and truth: on the contrary, the testimony concerning Christ and his salvation is so supremely excellent, as to dignify any kind of language by which it may be conveyed. See the Introduction, Section 2.”
- CCEL (Reformed) “Calvin, Commentary on 1-2 Timothy, Titus, Philemon, section 1.1: TRANSLATOR’S PREFACE IT may be natural to inquire why the Epistles to Timothy and Titus have been less copiously illustrated by popular Commentaries than the other writings of the Apostle Paul. The reason probably is, that they are addressed chiefly to office-bearers, and not to private members of the Church; though they abound largely in those doctrinal statements and practical instructions which every Christian ought carefully to study. While fewer expositors than might have been desired have devoted their labors to this portio”
- CCEL (Reformed) “Calvin, Harmony of the Law, Vol. 1, section 1.7: But there is yet another reason why so firm an upholder of the truth and authenticity of the Bible should have been greatly interested in an exposition of the Pentateuch. Even before the days of Calvin these precious Books had been a favorite point for the unbeliever’s assaults. They had not, indeed, been so systematically impugned as in these latter times; but still their credit had even then been assailed with no inconsiderable subtlety, and particular points in them had been subjected to severe and unfavorable criticism. Calvin’s remarks are ”
- CCEL (Reformed) “Calvin, Commentary on Genesis, Vol. 1 (Gen 1-23), section 3.7: its numbers, as if its dignity consisted in its multitude. If sometimes, in various places, Religion is less flourishing than could be wished, if the body of the pious is scattered, and the state of a well-regulated Church has gone to decay, not only do our minds sink, but entirely melt within us. On the contrary, while we see in this history of Moses, the building of the Church out of ruins, and the gathering of it out of broken fragments, and out of desolation itself, such an instance of the grace of God ought to raise us to firm”