Using Scripture to Critique and Correct Analogies and Examples
Using Scripture to Critique and Correct Analogies and Examples
Scripture employs various literary devices, including analogies and examples, to convey theological truths and moral lessons. However, the use of these devices can be problematic if not properly understood or if taken out of context. The biblical text itself provides guidance on how to critically evaluate analogies and examples.
The concept of analogy is rooted in the idea of comparison, where one thing is understood in relation to another. In Scripture, analogies are often used to explain complex theological concepts, such as the relationship between God and humanity [3]. For instance, the parables of Jesus use everyday scenarios to illustrate spiritual truths. However, as noted by Smith's Bible Dictionary, a parable is "literally a placing beside, a comparison, a similitude, an illustration of one subject by another" [3]. This highlights the importance of understanding the context and limitations of the analogy.
One key area where analogies are used is in understanding human nature and sin. The biblical account of humanity's fall in Genesis 3 is a prime example. According to Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, the sin of Adam and Eve was "a love of self, dishonor to God, ingratitude to a benefactor, disobedience to the best of Masters—a preference of the creature to the Creator" [6]. This understanding of sin as a fundamental aspect of human nature is echoed in other passages, such as Psalms 51:5 and Romans 1:18-32 [5, 7].
The use of examples in Scripture also requires careful consideration. Examples are often used to illustrate moral or theological points, such as the examples of Christ's suffering in 1 Peter 2:21 and the examples of pastors in Philippians 3:17 and 1 Timothy 4:12 [4]. However, as noted by Easton's Bible Dictionary, examples can be used in various ways, including as warnings or as models for behavior [4].
To critique and correct analogies and examples, one must consider the broader biblical context. For instance, the analogy of humanity as created in the image of God (Genesis 1:27, 5:1) is a fundamental concept in understanding human nature [1]. However, this analogy must be balanced with the reality of human sinfulness, as described in passages like Romans 1:18-32 and Ephesians 2:3 [7, 2].
The early Church Fathers also grappled with the use of analogies and examples in Scripture. John Chrysostom, for example, notes that the biblical writers often used analogies and metaphors to convey complex theological concepts [8]. Calvin, in his commentary on Genesis, highlights the importance of understanding the historical and cultural context of the biblical narrative [9].
Sources
- Treasury of Scripture Knowledge “Genesis 2:7 cross-references: Genesis 1:27, Genesis 3:19, Genesis 3:23, Genesis 7:22, Numbers 16:22, Numbers 27:16, Job 4:19, Job 27:3, Job 33:4, Job 33:6, Psalms 100:3, Psalms 103:14, Psalms 139:14, Proverbs 20:27, Ecclesiastes 3:7, Ecclesiastes 3:20, Ecclesiastes 12:7, Isaiah 2:22, Isaiah 64:8, Ezekiel 37:5, Ezekiel 37:6, Zechariah 12:1, John 20:22, Acts 17:25, Romans 9:20, 1 Corinthians 15:45, 1 Corinthians 15:47, 2 Corinthians 4:7, 2 Corinthians 5:1, Hebrews 12:9”
- Treasury of Scripture Knowledge “Ephesians 2:3 cross-references: Genesis 5:3, Genesis 6:5, Genesis 8:21, Job 14:4, Job 15:14, Job 25:4, Psalms 51:5, Isaiah 53:6, Isaiah 64:6, Daniel 9:5, Mark 4:19, Mark 7:21, John 1:13, John 3:1, John 8:44, Acts 14:16, Acts 17:30, Romans 1:24, Romans 3:9, Romans 3:22, Romans 5:12, Romans 6:12, Romans 7:18, Romans 8:7, Romans 9:22, Romans 11:30, Romans 13:14, 1 Corinthians 4:7, 1 Corinthians 6:9, 2 Corinthians 7:1, Galatians 2:15, Galatians 3:22, Galatians 5:16, Ephesians 2:2, Ephesians 4:17, Ephesians 4:22, 1 Timothy 6:9, Titus 3:3, James 4:1, 1 Peter 1:14, 1 Peter 2:10, 1 Peter 4:2, 2 Peter ”
- Smith's Bible Dictionary “Smith's Bible Dictionary: Parable — (The word parable is in Greek parable (parabole) which signifies placing beside or together, a comparison, a parable is therefore literally a placing beside, a comparison, a similitude, an illustration of one subject by another.--McClintock and Strong. As used in the New Testament it had a very wide application, being applied sometimes to the shortest proverbs, (1 Samuel 10:12; 24:13; 2 Chronicles 7:20) sometimes to dark prophetic utterances, (Numbers 23:7,18; 24:3; Ezekiel 20:49) sometimes to enigmatic maxims, (Psalms 78:2; Proverbs 1:6) or metaphors expand”
- Easton's Bible Dictionary “Easton's Bible Dictionary: Example — Of Christ (1 Pet. 2:21; John 13:15); of pastors to their flocks (Phil. 3:17; 2 Thess. 3:9; 1 Tim. 4:12; 1 Pet. 5:3); of the Jews as a warning (Heb. 4:11); of the prophets as suffering affliction (James 5:10).”
- Psalms (Protestant academic) “Tyndale House on Psalms 58:3: 58:3 All human beings are born sinners (see 51:5); however, whereas the wicked indulge their sinful nature, the godly fight against it (Rom 7:19-23; Jas 4:1-10).”
- Genesis (Presbyterian) “Jamieson, Fausset & Brown on Genesis 3:13: beguiled--cajoled by flattering lies. This sin of the first pair was heinous and aggravated--it was not simply eating an apple, but a love of self, dishonor to God, ingratitude to a benefactor, disobedience to the best of Masters--a preference of the creature to the Creator.”
- Romans (Protestant academic) “Tyndale House on Romans 1:18: 1:18–3:20 Paul delays exploring the theme of righteousness through faith (see 3:21) until after he first teaches about universal sinfulness. Gentiles (1:18-32) and Jews (2:1–3:8) are equally under sin’s power and cannot find favor with God by any action of their own (3:9-20). 1:18 God’s anger is not a spontaneous emotional outburst, but the holy God’s necessary response to sin. The Old Testament often depicts God’s anger (Exod 32:10-12; Num 11:1; Jer 21:3-7) and predicts a decisive outpouring of God’s wrath on human sin at the end of history. While Paul usually de”
- CCEL/NPNF (Eastern Orthodox) “John Chrysostom, Homilies on John & Hebrews: particular words and constructions, as of the general cast, both of the phraseology and the structure of the sentences; but that this similarity arises, not from the identity of the writers, but from the fact that both wrote in somewhat better Greek than is found in the rest of the New Testament. The grammars of the New Testament Greek continually refer to the fact, that certain classical constructions are found only, or at least more frequently, in these writers than elsewhere. But this does not prove more than that the author of this Epistle, as m”
- CCEL (Reformed) “Calvin, Commentary on Genesis, Vol. 1 (Gen 1-23), section 28.1: Index of Scripture References Genesis 1:1-6 1:1-31 1:2 1:28 1:29-30 2:1 2:1-25 2:15 2:19 3:1 3:1-24 3:7 3:16 4:1 4:1-26 4:7 5:1 5:1-32 6:1 6:1-22 6:11-16 7:1-24 7:11 8:1-22 9:1 9:1 9:1-29 9:2 9:24 10 10:1 10:1 10:1-32 10:21 11:1 11:1 11:1-32 11:28 12:1 12:1 12:1 12:1-20 12:4 12:4 12:6 13:1 13:1-20 14:1-24 15:1-21 15:7 16:1-16 16:2 16:8 17:1 17:1 17:1 17:1 17:1-27 18:1 18:1 18:1-33 18:19 19:1-38 20:1 20:1 20:1-18 21:1-34 21:15 22:1-24 22:18 23:1-20 24:31 25:1 25:13-16 35:7 48:1 Exodus 6:3 12:40 Leviticus 7:18 17:4 18:25 Numbers 6:2”